Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jan;175(1):18-24. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5398.
It remains unclear whether dabigatran etexilate mesylate is associated with higher risk of bleeding than warfarin sodium in real-world clinical practice.
To compare the risk of bleeding associated with dabigatran and warfarin using Medicare data.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used pharmacy and medical claims in 2010 to 2011 from a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries. We identified participants as those newly diagnosed as having atrial fibrillation from October 1, 2010, through October 31, 2011, and who initiated dabigatran or warfarin treatment within 60 days of initial diagnosis. We followed up patients until discontinued use or switch of anticoagulants, death, or December 31, 2011.
Dabigatran users (n = 1302) and warfarin users (n = 8102).
We identified any bleeding events and categorized them as major and minor bleeding by anatomical site. Major bleeding events included intracranial hemorrhage, hemoperitoneum, and inpatient or emergency department stays for hematuria, gastrointestinal, or other hemorrhage. We used a propensity score weighting mechanism to balance patient characteristics between 2 groups and Cox proportional hazards regression models to evaluate the risk of bleeding. We further examined the risk of bleeding for 4 subgroups of high-risk patients: those 75 years or older, African Americans, those with chronic kidney disease, and those with more than 7 concomitant comorbidities.
Dabigatran was associated with a higher risk of bleeding relative to warfarin, with hazard ratios of 1.30 (95% CI, 1.20-1.41) for any bleeding event, 1.58 (95% CI, 1.36-1.83) for major bleeding, and 1.85 (95% CI, 1.64-2.07) for gastrointestinal bleeding. The risk of intracranial hemorrhage was higher among warfarin users, with a hazard ratio of 0.32 (95% CI, 0.20-0.50) for dabigatran compared with warfarin. Dabigatran was consistently associated with an increased risk of major bleeding and gastrointestinal hemorrhage for all subgroups analyzed. The risk of major bleeding among dabigatran users was especially high for African Americans and patients with chronic kidney disease.
Dabigatran was associated with a higher incidence of major bleeding (regardless of the anatomical site), a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, but a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Thus, dabigatran should be prescribed with caution, especially among high-risk patients.
在真实临床实践中,甲磺酸达比加群酯与华法林钠相比是否出血风险更高仍不清楚。
使用医疗保险数据比较达比加群和华法林相关出血风险。
设计、地点和参与者:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们使用了 2010 年至 2011 年医疗保险受益人的 5%随机样本中的药房和医疗索赔数据。我们将参与者定义为 2010 年 10 月 1 日至 2011 年 10 月 31 日期间新诊断为心房颤动的患者,并在初始诊断后 60 天内开始接受达比加群或华法林治疗。我们对患者进行随访,直到停止使用或更换抗凝剂、死亡或 2011 年 12 月 31 日。
达比加群使用者(n=1302)和华法林使用者(n=8102)。
我们确定了任何出血事件,并根据解剖部位将其分类为主要和次要出血。主要出血事件包括颅内出血、血腹以及因血尿、胃肠道或其他出血而住院或急诊就诊。我们使用倾向评分加权机制在两组之间平衡患者特征,并使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型评估出血风险。我们进一步检查了 4 组高危患者的出血风险:年龄 75 岁或以上、非裔美国人、慢性肾脏病患者和合并症超过 7 种的患者。
与华法林相比,达比加群与出血风险增加相关,任何出血事件的风险比为 1.30(95%CI,1.20-1.41),主要出血的风险比为 1.58(95%CI,1.36-1.83),胃肠道出血的风险比为 1.85(95%CI,1.64-2.07)。华法林使用者颅内出血风险更高,达比加群与华法林相比,风险比为 0.32(95%CI,0.20-0.50)。达比加群与所有分析亚组的主要出血和胃肠道出血风险增加相关。达比加群使用者的主要出血风险,尤其是非裔美国人和慢性肾脏病患者的风险更高。
达比加群与主要出血(无论解剖部位)发生率增加、胃肠道出血风险增加相关,但颅内出血风险降低相关。因此,达比加群的处方应谨慎,尤其是在高危患者中。