Morris Craig F, Fuerst E Patrick, McLean Derek J, Momont Kathleen, James Caleb P
Author Morris is with USDA-ARS Western Wheat Quality Laboratory, E-202 Food Quality East, Washington State Univ, P.O. Box 646394, Pullman, WA, U.S.A.
J Food Sci. 2014 Nov;79(11):S2323-9. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12664. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plays a central role in the health and nutrition of humans. Yet, little is known about possible flavor differences among different varieties. We have developed a model system using the house mouse (Mus musculus L.) to determine feeding preferences as a prelude to extending results to human sensory analysis. Here, we examine the application of a single-elimination tournament design to the analysis of consumption preferences of a set of hard red and hard white spring wheat varieties. A single-elimination tournament design in this case pairs 2 wheat varieties and only 1 of the 2 is advanced to further tests. Preferred varieties were advanced until an overall "winner" was identified; conversely, less desirable varieties were advanced such that an overall "loser" was identified. Hollis and IDO702 were the winner and loser, respectively, for the hard red varieties, and Clear White 515 and WA8123 were the winner and loser, respectively, for the hard white varieties. When using the more powerful protocol of 14 mice and a 4-d trial, differences in mean daily consumption preferences of 2 varieties were separated at P-values as small as 2 × 10(-8) . The single-elimination tournament design is an efficient means of identifying the most and least desirable varieties among a larger set of samples. One application for identifying the 2 extremes in preference within a group of varieties would be to use them as parents of a population to identify quantitative trait loci for preference.
小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)在人类健康和营养方面发挥着核心作用。然而,对于不同品种之间可能存在的风味差异却知之甚少。我们开发了一种利用家鼠(Mus musculus L.)的模型系统来确定进食偏好,以此作为将结果扩展至人类感官分析的前奏。在此,我们研究了单淘汰赛设计在一组硬红春小麦和硬白春小麦品种消费偏好分析中的应用。在这种情况下,单淘汰赛设计将两个小麦品种配对,两个品种中只有一个能进入进一步测试。受欢迎的品种会继续进行测试,直到确定总体“获胜者”;相反,不太受欢迎的品种也继续测试,直到确定总体“失败者”。对于硬红品种,霍利斯(Hollis)和IDO702分别是获胜者和失败者;对于硬白品种,纯白515(Clear White 515)和WA8123分别是获胜者和失败者。当使用更强大的方案,即14只小鼠和为期4天的试验时,两个品种平均每日消费偏好的差异在P值小至2×10⁻⁸时就可区分开来。单淘汰赛设计是在大量样本中识别最受欢迎和最不受欢迎品种的有效方法。在一组品种中识别偏好的两个极端的一个应用是将它们用作群体的亲本,以识别偏好的数量性状位点。