From the Department of Health Policy and Management, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Chest. 2014 Nov;146(5):1413-1419. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2367.
Most physicians are unfamiliar with the details of the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS) and how changes in the RBRVS influence Medicare and private reimbursement rates. Physicians in a wide variety of settings may benefit from understanding the RBRVS, including physicians who are employees, because many organizations use relative value units as productivity measures. Despite the complexity of the RBRVS, its logic and ideal are simple: In theory, the resource usage (comprising physician work, practice expense, and liability insurance premium costs) for one service is relative to the resource usage of all others. Ensuring relativity when new services are introduced or existing services are changed is, therefore, critical. Since the inception of the RBRVS, the American Medical Association's Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) has made recommendations to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on changes to relative value units. The RUC's core focus is to develop estimates of physician work, but work estimates also partly determine practice expense payments. Critics have attributed various health-care system problems, including declining and growing gaps between primary care and specialist incomes, to the RUC's role in the RBRVS update process. There are persistent concerns regarding the quality of data used in the process and the potential for services to be overvalued. The Affordable Care Act addresses some of these concerns by increasing payments to primary care physicians, requiring reevaluation of the data underlying work relative value units, and reviewing misvalued codes.
大多数医生不熟悉资源为基础的相对价值量表(RBRVS)的细节,以及 RBRVS 的变化如何影响医疗保险和私人报销率。各种环境下的医生都可能从了解 RBRVS 中受益,包括作为雇员的医生,因为许多组织将相对价值单位用作生产力衡量标准。尽管 RBRVS 很复杂,但它的逻辑和理念很简单:理论上,一项服务的资源使用(包括医生的工作、实践费用和责任保险费成本)与所有其他服务的资源使用相对应。因此,确保新服务引入或现有服务变更时的相对性至关重要。自 RBRVS 成立以来,美国医学协会的相对价值量表更新委员会(RUC)已就相对价值单位的变更向医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心提出建议。RUC 的核心重点是开发医生工作的估计,但工作估计也部分决定实践费用的支付。批评者将各种医疗保健系统问题归因于 RUC 在 RBRVS 更新过程中的作用,包括初级保健和专科医生收入之间的差距缩小和扩大。人们一直对该过程中使用的数据质量以及服务被高估的可能性表示关注。平价医疗法案通过增加对初级保健医生的支付、要求重新评估工作相对价值单位的基础数据以及审查估值错误的代码,解决了其中一些问题。