• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

并非所有初次全髋关节置换术都是一样的,那么在报销方面有差异吗?

Not all primary total hip arthroplasties are equal-so is there a difference in reimbursement?

作者信息

Sodhi Nipun, Dalton Sarah E, Garbarino Luke J, Gold Peter A, Piuzzi Nicolas S, Newman Jared M, Khlopas Anton, Sultan Assem A, Chughtai Morad, Mont Michael A

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA.

Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2019 Feb;7(4):74. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.08.14.

DOI:10.21037/atm.2018.08.14
PMID:30963069
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6409238/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Relative value units (RVUs) are a physician reimbursement model based on the effort required, or value, in providing a procedure or service for a patient. Procedures such as conversion total hip arthroplasties (THAs) can be compared to primary THAs, but many studies have revealed increased difficulties in conversion cases. Despite the increased time and effort for conversion THA, it is unknown if this is reflected in the RVU compensation model. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the: (I) mean operative times; (II) mean RVUs; (III) RVU/minute for primary and conversion THAs; and (IV) perform an individualized idealized surgeon annual cost difference analysis.

METHODS

A total of 103,702 primary THA patients were identified using CPT code 27130 and 2,986 conversion THA patients were identified using CPT code 27132 using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. The mean RVUs, operative times (minutes), and RVU/minute were calculated and compared. An annualize cost analysis of dollar amounts per case, day, and the year was also performed.

RESULTS

The mean operative times for the primary and conversion THA cohorts were 94 146 minutes (P<0.001) and mean RVUs were 21.24 25.68 (P<0.001). Interestingly, the mean RVU per minute was higher for the primary THA compared to the conversion THA groups (0.26 0.21, P<0.001). Annualized cost analysis revealed a potential $173,529 difference from performing primary conversion THAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though conversion THA can be considered to a more complex and demanding procedure, based on RVUs per minute of surgery, orthopaedic surgeons are reimbursed better for primary THA cases. This data could be used by orthopaedic surgeons to administer their practices better to yield the highest return on time.

摘要

背景

相对价值单位(RVUs)是一种基于为患者提供手术或服务所需的努力程度或价值的医生报销模式。诸如全髋关节置换术(THA)翻修手术等手术可与初次THA进行比较,但许多研究表明翻修病例的难度增加。尽管翻修THA所需的时间和精力增加,但尚不清楚这是否反映在RVU补偿模式中。因此,本研究的目的是比较:(I)平均手术时间;(II)平均RVUs;(III)初次和翻修THA的每分钟RVU;以及(IV)进行个体化的理想化外科医生年度成本差异分析。

方法

使用国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库,通过CPT编码27130识别出103702例初次THA患者,通过CPT编码27132识别出2986例翻修THA患者。计算并比较平均RVUs、手术时间(分钟)和每分钟RVU。还对每个病例、每天和每年的美元金额进行了年度成本分析。

结果

初次和翻修THA队列的平均手术时间分别为94±146分钟(P<0.001),平均RVUs分别为21.24±25.68(P<0.001)。有趣的是,与翻修THA组相比,初次THA组的每分钟平均RVU更高(0.26±0.21,P<0.001)。年度成本分析显示,进行初次与翻修THA之间存在潜在的173529美元差异。

结论

尽管翻修THA可被认为是一种更复杂且要求更高的手术,但基于每分钟手术的RVUs,骨科医生在初次THA病例中的报销更好。骨科医生可利用这些数据更好地管理他们的业务,以获得最高的时间回报率。

相似文献

1
Not all primary total hip arthroplasties are equal-so is there a difference in reimbursement?并非所有初次全髋关节置换术都是一样的,那么在报销方面有差异吗?
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Feb;7(4):74. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.08.14.
2
Are We Appropriately Compensated by Relative Value Units for Primary vs Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?初次全髋关节置换术与翻修全髋关节置换术的相对价值单位补偿是否合理?
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):340-344. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.019. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
3
Barriers to Revision Total Hip Service Lines: A Surgeon's Perspective Through a Deterministic Financial Model.翻修全髋关节服务线的障碍:通过确定性财务模型的外科医生视角。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):1657-1666. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001273.
4
A Comparison of Relative Value Units in Primary Versus Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.初次全膝关节置换术与翻修全膝关节置换术的相对价值单位比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S39-S42. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.070. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
5
A comparison of relative value units in revision hip versus revision knee arthroplasty.髋关节翻修术与膝关节翻修术相对价值单位的比较。
J Orthop. 2018 Dec 20;16(1):45-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.12.010. eCollection 2019 Jan-Feb.
6
Comparison of a Posterior versus Anterior Approach for Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Based on Relative Value Units.基于相对价值单位对腰椎椎间融合手术的后路与前路手术方法的比较。
Surg Technol Int. 2019 Nov 10;35:363-368.
7
What provides a better value for your time? The use of relative value units to compare posterior segmental instrumentation of vertebral segments.哪种方法更能节省时间?使用相对价值单位比较脊柱节段的后节段器械置入。
Spine J. 2018 Oct;18(10):1727-1732. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.026. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
8
Work Relative Value Units Do Not Adequately Support the Burden of Infection Management in Revision Knee Arthroplasty.工作相关值单位不能充分支持膝关节翻修术中感染管理的负担。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Feb 5;102(3):230-236. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00776.
9
A Comparison of Relative Value Units in Primary versus Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty.初次与翻修全踝关节置换术中相对价值单位的比较
Surg Technol Int. 2017 Dec 22;31:322-326.
10
A Retrospective Review of Reimbursement in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Disparity Between Case Complexity and RVU Compensation.翻修全髋关节置换术报销的回顾性研究:病例复杂性与 RVU 补偿之间的差异。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Aug;37(8S):S807-S813. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.025. Epub 2022 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishing a Per-Hour Rate for Early-Career Adult Reconstruction Surgeons Performing Medicare Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.为进行医疗保险初次全关节置换术的早期职业成人重建外科医生确定每小时收费标准。
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Aug 7;29:101416. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101416. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Are Gender-Affirming Plastic Surgeons Adequately Compensated? An Analysis of Relative Value Units.性别肯定整形医生的报酬是否合理?相对价值单位的分析。
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Jan 1;92(1):97-99. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003708.
3
Variation in Estimated Surgical Procedure Times Across Patient Characteristics and Surgeon Specialty.患者特征和外科医生专业对手术预估时间的影响差异。
JAMA Surg. 2022 May 1;157(5):e220099. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0099. Epub 2022 May 11.
4
Complication Rates of Hemiarthroplasty Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.半髋关节置换术转换为全髋关节置换术与初次全髋关节置换术的并发症发生率
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2021 Jul 10;13(2):25539. doi: 10.52965/001c.25539. eCollection 2021.
5
Comparing Relative Value Units among Shoulder Arthroplasty, Hemiarthroplasty, and ORIF for Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly: Which is Most Worth Your Time?比较老年肱骨近端骨折的肩关节置换术、半关节置换术和切开复位内固定术的相对价值单位:哪种最值得你花费时间?
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021 Jul;9(4):406-411. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2020.51204.2539.
6
Total Hip Arthroplasty for Developmental Dysplasia of Hip vs Osteoarthritis: A Propensity Matched Pair Analysis.发育性髋关节发育不良与骨关节炎的全髋关节置换术:倾向匹配对分析
Arthroplast Today. 2020 Jun 22;6(3):607-611.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.02.018. eCollection 2020 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of nondisplaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures with internal screw fixation in elderly patients: a systematic review.老年患者无移位型股骨颈囊内骨折行内螺钉固定的疗效:一项系统评价
Hip Int. 2018 Jan;28(1):18-28. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000532.
2
Paired Comparison Survey Analyses Utilizing Rasch Methodology of the Relative Difficulty and Estimated Work Relative Value Units of CPT Code 27279.使用Rasch方法对CPT代码27279的相对难度和估计工作相对价值单位进行配对比较调查分析。
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Dec 1;10:40. doi: 10.14444/3040. eCollection 2016.
3
Quantifying Blood Loss and Transfusion Risk After Primary vs Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty.初次与转换式全髋关节置换术后失血量及输血风险的量化分析
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1902-1909. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.038. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
4
Medicare Program; Revisions to Payment Policies Under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Revisions to Part B for CY 2017; Medicare Advantage Bid Pricing Data Release; Medicare Advantage and Part D Medical Loss Ratio Data Release; Medicare Advantage Provider Network Requirements; Expansion of Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program Model; Medicare Shared Savings Program Requirements. Final rule.医疗保险计划;2017 年医师费率表下支付政策的修订及 B 部分的其他修订;医疗保险优势投标定价数据发布;医疗保险优势和 D 部分医疗损失率数据发布;医疗保险优势提供商网络要求;医疗保险糖尿病预防计划模式的扩展;医疗保险共享节约计划要求。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2016 Nov 15;81(220):80170-562.
5
Do Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Yield Comparable Results to Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?翻修全髋关节置换术的结果与初次全髋关节置换术相当吗?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):862-871. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.036. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
6
A Current Procedural Terminology Code for "Knee Conversion" Is Needed to Account for the Additional Surgical Time Required Compared to Total Knee Arthroplasty.需要一个“膝关节转换”的现行手术操作术语编码,以说明与全膝关节置换术相比所需的额外手术时间。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):20-23. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.040. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
7
Pediatric Echocardiography by Work Relative Value Units: Is Study Complexity Adequately Captured?按工作相对价值单位计算的儿科超声心动图:研究复杂性是否得到充分体现?
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016 Nov;29(11):1084-1091. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
8
How Relative Value Units Undervalue the Cognitive Physician Visit: A Focus on Inflammatory Bowel Disease.相对价值单位如何低估认知型医生诊疗:以炎症性肠病为例
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2016 Apr;12(4):240-4.
9
Conversion total hip arthroplasty: Primary or revision total hip arthroplasty.转换型全髋关节置换术:初次或翻修全髋关节置换术。
World J Orthop. 2015 Nov 18;6(10):750-3. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i10.750.
10
The Relative Value Unit: History, Current Use, and Controversies.相对价值单位:历史、当前用途及争议
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016 Mar-Apr;45(2):128-32. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Oct 9.