Suppr超能文献

单肺通气期间容量控制通气与压力控制通气-容量保证模式的比较

Volume-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed mode during one-lung ventilation.

作者信息

Song Seok Young, Jung Jin Yong, Cho Min-Su, Kim Jong Hae, Ryu Tae Ha, Kim Bong Il

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 Oct;67(4):258-63. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2014.67.4.258. Epub 2014 Oct 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes in airway pressure and arterial oxygenation between ventilation modes during one-lung ventilation (OLV) in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.

METHODS

We enrolled 27 patients for thoracic surgery with OLV in the lateral decubitus position. The subjects received various modes of ventilation in random sequences during surgery, including volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed (PCV-VG) with a tidal volume (TV) of 8 ml/kg of actual body weight. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) with propofol and remifentanil was used for anesthesia induction and maintenance. After double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) insertion, the proper positioning of the DLT was assessed using a fiberoptic bronchoscope. Peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak), exhaled TV, and arterial blood gas were measured 30 min after each ventilation mode.

RESULTS

Ppeak was significantly reduced with the PCV-VG mode (19.6 ± 2.5 cmH2O) compared with the VCV mode (23.2 ± 3.1 cmH2O) (P < 0.000). However, no difference in arterial oxygen tension was noted between the groups (PCV-VG, 375.8 ± 145.1 mmHg; VCV, 328.1 ± 123.7 mmHg) (P = 0.063). The exhaled TV was also significantly increased in PCV-VG compared with VCV (451.4 ± 85.4 vs. 443.9 ± 85.9 ml; P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

During OLV in patients with normal lung function, although PCV-VG did not provide significantly improved arterial oxygen tension compared with VCV, PCV-VG provided significantly attenuated airway pressure despite significantly increased exhaled TV compared with VCV.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在调查胸科手术患者单肺通气(OLV)期间不同通气模式下气道压力和动脉氧合的变化。

方法

我们纳入了27例接受侧卧位OLV的胸科手术患者。受试者在手术期间以随机顺序接受各种通气模式,包括潮气量(TV)为实际体重8 ml/kg的容量控制通气(VCV)和压力控制通气-容量保证(PCV-VG)。使用丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼靶控输注(TCI)进行麻醉诱导和维持。插入双腔支气管导管(DLT)后,使用纤维支气管镜评估DLT的正确位置。每种通气模式30分钟后测量吸气峰压(Ppeak)、呼出TV和动脉血气。

结果

与VCV模式(23.2±3.1 cmH₂O)相比,PCV-VG模式下的Ppeak显著降低(19.6±2.5 cmH₂O)(P<0.000)。然而,两组之间的动脉氧分压没有差异(PCV-VG,375.8±145.1 mmHg;VCV,328.1±123.7 mmHg)(P = 0.063)。与VCV相比,PCV-VG模式下的呼出TV也显著增加(451.4±85.4 vs. 443.9±85.9 ml;P = 0.035)。

结论

在肺功能正常的患者OLV期间,尽管与VCV相比,PCV-VG并未显著改善动脉氧分压,但与VCV相比,PCV-VG在呼出TV显著增加的情况下显著降低了气道压力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5761/4216788/aa82976e502d/kjae-67-258-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验