Li Jilai, Ryde Ulf
Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Chemical Centre, Lund University , P.O. Box 124, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden.
Inorg Chem. 2014 Nov 17;53(22):11913-24. doi: 10.1021/ic5010837. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
There are three families of mononuclear molybdenum enzymes that catalyze oxygen atom transfer (OAT) reactions, named after a typical example from each family, viz., dimethyl sulfoxide reductase (DMSOR), sulfite oxidase (SO), and xanthine oxidase (XO). These families differ in the construction of their active sites, with two molybdopterin groups in the DMSOR family, two oxy groups in the SO family, and a sulfido group in the XO family. We have employed density functional theory calculations on cluster models of the active sites to understand the selection of molybdenum ligands in the three enzyme families. Our calculations show that the DMSOR active site has a much stronger oxidative power than the other two sites, owing to the extra molybdopterin ligand. However, the active sites do not seem to have been constructed to make the OAT reaction as exergonic as possible, but instead to keep the reaction free energy close to zero (to avoid excessive loss of energy), thereby making the reoxidation (SO and XO) or rereduction of the active sites (DMSOR) after the OAT reaction facile. We also show that active-site models of the three enzyme families can all catalyze the reduction of DMSO and that the DMSOR model does not give the lowest activation barrier. Likewise, all three models can catalyze the oxidation of sulfite, provided that the Coulombic repulsion between the substrate and the enzyme model can be overcome, but for this harder reaction, the SO model gives the lowest activation barrier, although the differences are not large. However, only the XO model can catalyze the oxidation of xanthine, owing to its sulfido ligand.
有三类单核钼酶可催化氧原子转移(OAT)反应,它们分别以每个家族的一个典型例子命名,即二甲基亚砜还原酶(DMSOR)、亚硫酸盐氧化酶(SO)和黄嘌呤氧化酶(XO)。这些家族的活性位点结构不同,DMSOR家族有两个钼蝶呤基团,SO家族有两个氧基团,XO家族有一个硫基团。我们对活性位点的簇模型进行了密度泛函理论计算,以了解这三个酶家族中钼配体的选择。我们的计算表明,由于额外的钼蝶呤配体,DMSOR活性位点的氧化能力比其他两个位点强得多。然而,活性位点的构建似乎并不是为了使OAT反应尽可能地放能,而是为了使反应自由能接近零(以避免能量过度损失),从而使OAT反应后活性位点的再氧化(SO和XO)或再还原(DMSOR)变得容易。我们还表明,这三个酶家族的活性位点模型都可以催化二甲基亚砜的还原,并且DMSOR模型并没有给出最低的活化能垒。同样,只要能克服底物与酶模型之间的库仑排斥力,所有三个模型都可以催化亚硫酸盐的氧化,但对于这个较难的反应,SO模型给出了最低的活化能垒,尽管差异不大。然而,由于其硫配体,只有XO模型可以催化黄嘌呤的氧化。