Bray R C, Adams B, Smith A T, Bennett B, Bailey S
School of Chemistry, Physics and Environmental Science, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QJ, UK.
Biochemistry. 2000 Sep 19;39(37):11258-69. doi: 10.1021/bi0000521.
Much is unknown concerning the role of thiolate ligands of molybdenum in molybdopterin enzymes. It has been suggested that thiolate dissociation from molybdenum is part of the catalytic mechanism of bis-molybdopterin enzymes of the dimethyl sulfoxide reductase (DMSOR) family. For DMSOR from Rhodobacter capsulatus, thiolate dissociation has therefore been investigated crystallographically, by UV/visible spectroscopy, and by enzyme assays. When crystallized from sodium citrate, all four thiolates of DMSOR are within bonding distance of Mo, but after extended exposure to Na(+)-Hepes, a pair of thiolates dissociates, a mixture of structures being indicated after shorter exposures to this buffer. DMSOR is stable in sodium citrate and other buffers but unstable aerobically although not anaerobically in Na(+)-Hepes. Aerobically in Na(+)-Hepes, a first-order reaction (k = 0.032 hr(-)(1) at 37 degrees C) leads to loss of activity in the backward but not the forward (dimethyl sulfoxide reduction) assay and loss of absorption at lambda > approximately 450 nm. This reaction can be reversed by a cycle of reduction and reoxidation ("redox-cycling"). Slower irreversible loss of activity in the forward assay and cofactor dissociation follow. Spectral analogy with a mono-molybdopterin enzyme supports the conclusion that in the Hepes-modified DMSOR form, only two cofactor dithiolene sulfur atoms are coordinated to molybdenum. Loss of activity provides the first clear evidence that sulfur ligand dissociation is an artifact, not part of the catalytic cycle. Clearly, structural data on DMSOR samples extensively exposed to Hepes is not directly relevant to the native enzyme. The nature of the oxygen ligands detected crystallographically is discussed, as is the specificity of Hepes and the mechanism whereby its effects are achieved. DMSOR forms complexes with Na(+)-Hepes and other buffer ions. For DMSOR crystallized from Hepes, electron density in the substrate binding channel suggests that buffers bind in this site. Like the as-prepared enzyme, the modified form (DMSOR(mod)D), known to arise on extended aerobic exposure to dimethyl sulfide, is susceptible to a further degradative reaction, although this is not buffer-dependent. It involves loss of absorption at lambda > approximately 450 nm and, presumably, dissociation of thiolate ligands. Evidence is presented that, as a result of O(2) damage, DMSOR samples not submitted to redox-cycling may be contaminated with DMSOR(mod)D and with material absorbing in the region of 400 nm, analogous to the Hepes-modified enzyme. Since the latter lacks absorption at lambda > approximately 450 nm, its presence may escape detection.
关于钼蝶呤酶中钼硫醇盐配体的作用,仍有许多未知之处。有人提出,钼硫醇盐从钼上解离是二甲基亚砜还原酶(DMSOR)家族双钼蝶呤酶催化机制的一部分。因此,对于来自荚膜红细菌的DMSOR,已经通过晶体学、紫外/可见光谱和酶分析等方法对硫醇盐解离进行了研究。当从柠檬酸钠中结晶时,DMSOR的所有四个硫醇盐都在钼的键合距离内,但在长时间暴露于Na(+)-Hepes后,一对硫醇盐会解离,在较短时间暴露于该缓冲液后显示出结构混合物。DMSOR在柠檬酸钠和其他缓冲液中稳定,但在有氧条件下不稳定,尽管在Na(+)-Hepes中无氧时稳定。在有氧条件下于Na(+)-Hepes中,一级反应(37℃时k = 0.032 hr(-)(1))导致在反向(但不是正向,即二甲基亚砜还原)分析中活性丧失,并且在λ>约450 nm处吸收丧失。该反应可以通过还原和再氧化循环(“氧化还原循环”)逆转。随后在正向分析中活性出现较慢的不可逆丧失以及辅因子解离。与单钼蝶呤酶的光谱类比支持这样的结论,即在Hepes修饰的DMSOR形式中,只有两个辅因子二硫烯硫原子与钼配位。活性丧失提供了第一个明确的证据,表明硫配体解离是一种假象,而不是催化循环的一部分。显然,大量暴露于Hepes的DMSOR样品的结构数据与天然酶没有直接相关性。讨论了晶体学检测到的氧配体的性质,以及Hepes的特异性及其作用实现的机制。DMSOR与Na(+)-Hepes和其他缓冲离子形成复合物。对于从Hepes中结晶的DMSOR,底物结合通道中的电子密度表明缓冲液结合在该位点。与制备好的酶一样,已知在长时间有氧暴露于二甲基硫时产生的修饰形式(DMSOR(mod)D)易受进一步的降解反应影响,尽管这与缓冲液无关。它涉及在λ>约450 nm处吸收丧失,并且可能硫醇盐配体解离。有证据表明,由于O(2)损伤,未进行氧化还原循环的DMSOR样品可能被DMSOR(mod)D和在400 nm区域有吸收的物质污染,类似于Hepes修饰的酶。由于后者在λ>约450 nm处缺乏吸收,其存在可能无法被检测到。