Leutgeb R, Szecsenyi J, Kuehlein T, Laux G
Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg.
Allgemeinmedizinisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen.
Gesundheitswesen. 2015 Oct;77(10):757-60. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390434. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
Little is known of the primary care characteristics in out of hours care centres (OOHC) as compared to regular care in Germany. Obviously the provision of patients in OOHC exhibits special characteristics concerning supply requirements, occupation and physician services, that require a first approximation.
The data retrieval is managed within the CONTENT (CONTinous morbidity registration Epidemiologic NeTwork) research network. The used software allows for classifying reasons for encounter (RFE), health-problems (diagnoses) and processes of care (prescriptions, referrals, hospitalisations) with the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC). Furthermore the software allows for pseudonymised data export. One OOHC Centre in South Hessen is part of the network. Therefore, this allows the comparison of this OOHC centre with the regular care of the included 5 physicians in 4 practices of the same region.
A 3-year period (01 April 2010-31 March 2013) with 192,827 patient contacts of 13,394 patients (58.1% female) in regular care and 14,354 patient contacts with 9,208 patients (64.1% female) in OOHC was described. Medium age of the patients of the regular provision was 59.6 vs. 45.7 years in the OOHC centre based on the contacts (p<0.0001). The most frequent RFE in the OOHC centre were fever and pain predominantly caused by acute infections, injuries or acute pain of the musculoskeletal system. In regular care there could be documented predominantly chronic health issues and vaccinations. The prevalent prescriptions in OOHC were therefore antibiotics and analgesics in regular care blood pressure medication and antidiabetic drugs. The rate of referrals was obviously lower than in regular care (7.1 vs. 22.7; p<0.0001), whereas the rate of hospitalisations was obviously higher in OOHC than in regular care (5.6 vs. 1.1; p<0.0001).
With the help of the data, requirements, occupation, resulting diagnoses and care processes in regular and out of hours care can be compared and described in detail. We could document major differences between the provision in OOHC and regular care. The results encourage initiating further studies to ensure the supply of primary care in OOHC.
与德国的常规医疗相比,人们对非工作时间护理中心(OOHC)的初级护理特征知之甚少。显然,OOHC的患者提供情况在供应需求、职业和医生服务方面具有特殊特征,需要初步评估。
数据检索在CONTENT(持续发病率登记流行病学网络)研究网络内进行管理。所使用的软件允许根据国际初级保健分类(ICPC)对就诊原因(RFE)、健康问题(诊断)和护理过程(处方、转诊、住院)进行分类。此外,该软件允许导出匿名数据。黑森州南部的一个OOHC中心是该网络的一部分。因此,这使得可以将这个OOHC中心与同一地区4家诊所中5名医生的常规护理进行比较。
描述了一个为期3年的时间段(2010年4月1日至2013年3月31日),常规护理中有13394名患者的192827次患者接触,OOHC中有9208名患者的14354次患者接触(女性占64.1%)。根据接触情况,常规护理患者的平均年龄为59.6岁,而OOHC中心为45.7岁(p<0.0001)。OOHC中心最常见的RFE是发热和疼痛,主要由急性感染、损伤或肌肉骨骼系统的急性疼痛引起。在常规护理中,主要记录的是慢性健康问题和疫苗接种。因此,OOHC中普遍开具的处方是抗生素和镇痛药,常规护理中是血压药物和抗糖尿病药物。转诊率明显低于常规护理(7.1对22.7;p<0.0001),而OOHC中的住院率明显高于常规护理(5.6对1.1;p<0.0001)。
借助这些数据,可以比较和详细描述常规护理和非工作时间护理中的需求、职业、诊断结果和护理过程。我们能够记录OOHC护理和常规护理之间的主要差异。这些结果鼓励开展进一步研究,以确保OOHC的初级护理供应。