Suppr超能文献

综合健康活动量表的开发与验证:一种健康素养测量的新方法。

Development and validation of the comprehensive health activities scale: a new approach to health literacy measurement.

作者信息

Curtis Laura M, Revelle William, Waite Katherine, Wilson Elizabeth A H, Condon David M, Bojarski Elizabeth, Park Denise C, Baker David W, Wolf Michael S

机构信息

a Health Literacy and Learning Program, Division of General Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine , Northwestern University , Chicago , Illinois , USA.

出版信息

J Health Commun. 2015;20(2):157-64. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.917744. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

Abstract

Current health literacy measures have been criticized for solely measuring reading and numeracy skills when a broader set of skills is necessary for making informed health decisions, especially when information is often conveyed verbally and through multimedia video. The authors devised 9 health tasks and a corresponding 190-item assessment to more comprehensively measure health literacy skills. A sample of 826 participants between the ages of 55 and 74 years who were recruited from an academic general internal medicine practice and three federally qualified health centers in Chicago, Illinois, completed the assessment. Items were reduced using hierarchical factor analysis and item response theory resulting in the 45-item Comprehensive Health Activities Scale. All 45 items loaded on 1 general latent trait, and the resulting scale demonstrated high reliability and strong construct validity using measures of health literacy and global cognitive functioning. The predictive validity of the Comprehensive Health Activities Scale using self-reported general, physical, and mental health status was comparable to or better than widely used measures of health literacy, depending on the outcome. Despite comprehensively measuring health literacy skills, items in the Comprehensive Health Activities Scale supported 1 primary construct. With similar psychometric properties, current measures may be adequate, depending on the purpose of the assessment.

摘要

当前的健康素养测评方法受到了批评,因为在做出明智的健康决策需要更广泛技能集的情况下,这些方法却仅仅测量阅读和算术技能,特别是当信息常常通过口头和多媒体视频来传达时。作者设计了9项健康任务和一项包含190个条目的相应评估,以更全面地测量健康素养技能。从伊利诺伊州芝加哥的一个学术性普通内科诊所和三个联邦合格健康中心招募了826名年龄在55岁至74岁之间的参与者作为样本,完成了该评估。使用层次因子分析和项目反应理论减少条目数量,从而形成了包含45个条目的综合健康活动量表。所有45个条目都加载在1个一般潜在特质上,并且使用健康素养和整体认知功能的测量方法,所得量表显示出高信度和强结构效度。根据结果,使用自我报告的总体、身体和心理健康状况的综合健康活动量表的预测效度与广泛使用的健康素养测量方法相当或更好。尽管综合健康活动量表全面测量了健康素养技能,但其条目支持1个主要结构。鉴于具有相似的心理测量特性,根据评估目的,当前的测量方法可能是足够的。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the comprehensive health activities scale: a new approach to health literacy measurement.
J Health Commun. 2015;20(2):157-64. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.917744. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
2
Measuring health literacy: a pilot study of a new skills-based instrument.
J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 2:51-71. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.499987.
3
Development and evaluation of the Korean Health Literacy Instrument.
J Health Commun. 2014;19 Suppl 2:254-66. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.946113.
4
The Health Literacy Skills Instrument: a 10-item short form.
J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 3:191-202. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.718042.
5
Self-administered health literacy instruments for people with diabetes: systematic review of measurement properties.
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Sep;73(9):2035-2048. doi: 10.1111/jan.13256. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
6
Validation of a Short, 3-Item Version of the Subjective Numeracy Scale.
Med Decis Making. 2015 Nov;35(8):932-6. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15581800. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
7
Development, validation and performance of a newly designed tool to evaluate functional medication literacy in Slovenia.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Dec;42(6):1490-1498. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01138-6. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
9
Health literacy measurement: an inventory and descriptive summary of 51 instruments.
J Health Commun. 2014;19 Suppl 2:302-33. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.936571.
10
The mini mental status exam as a surrogate measure of health literacy.
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Apr;29(4):615-20. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2712-x. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Tools to measure barriers to medication management capacity in older adults: a scoping review.
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04893-7.
2
Caregiver health literacy and health task performance: Findings from the LitCog caregiver cohort study.
PEC Innov. 2023 Dec 5;3:100240. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100240. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
3
Defining and identifying laboratory literacy as a component of health literacy: An assessment of existing health literacy tools.
Acad Pathol. 2023 Nov 2;10(4):100096. doi: 10.1016/j.acpath.2023.100096. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
8
Measuring health literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of instruments from 1993 to 2021.
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 15;17(7):e0271524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271524. eCollection 2022.
10
Development and Validation of a Culture-Sensitive Generic Health Literacy Scale in Turkish-Speaking Adults.
Health Lit Res Pract. 2022 Jan;6(1):e2-e11. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20211208-01. Epub 2022 Jan 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Very Simple Structure: An Alternative Procedure For Estimating The Optimal Number Of Interpretable Factors.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1979 Oct 1;14(4):403-14. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1404_2.
2
What did the doctor say? Health literacy and recall of medical instructions.
Med Care. 2012 Apr;50(4):277-82. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318241e8e1.
3
Measuring health literacy: a pilot study of a new skills-based instrument.
J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 2:51-71. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.499987.
4
Media and memory: the efficacy of video and print materials for promoting patient education about asthma.
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Sep;80(3):393-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.011. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
5
Critical appraisal of health literacy indices revealed variable underlying constructs, narrow content and psychometric weaknesses.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):366-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.005. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
7
Longitudinal Change and Prediction of Everyday Task Competence in the Elderly.
Res Aging. 1992 Mar 1;14(1):68-91. doi: 10.1177/0164027592141004.
10
Development and validation of a short-form, rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine.
Med Care. 2007 Nov;45(11):1026-33. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180616c1b.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验