• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用社区准备度模型审视建成环境与社会环境:以华盛顿州西雅图市海港区社区为例,2000 - 2010年

Using the community readiness model to examine the built and social environment: a case study of the High Point neighborhood, Seattle, Washington, 2000-2010.

作者信息

Buckner-Brown Joyce, Sharify Denise Tung, Blake Bonita, Phillips Tom, Whitten Kathleen

机构信息

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, NE, Mailstop K81, Atlanta, GA. E-mail:

Neighborhood House Community Health Program, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Nov 6;11:E194. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.140235.

DOI:10.5888/pcd11.140235
PMID:25376016
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4222786/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Residents of many cities lack affordable, quality housing. Economically disadvantaged neighborhoods often have high rates of poverty and crime, few institutions that enhance the quality of its residents' lives, and unsafe environments for walking and other physical activity. Deteriorating housing contributes to asthma-related illness. We describe the redevelopment of High Point, a West Seattle neighborhood, to improve its built environment, increase neighborhood physical activity, and reduce indoor asthma triggers.

COMMUNITY CONTEXT

High Point is one of Seattle's most demographically diverse neighborhoods. Prior to redevelopment, it had a distressed infrastructure, rising crime rates, and indoor environments that increased asthma-related illness in children and adolescents. High Point residents and partners developed and implemented a comprehensive redevelopment plan to create a sustainable built environment to increase outdoor physical activity and improve indoor environments.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the High Point redevelopment, organized by the different stages of change in the Community Readiness Model. We also examined the multisector partnerships among government and community groups that contributed to the success of the High Point project.

OUTCOME

Overall quality of life for residents improved as a result of neighborhood redevelopment. Physical activity increased, residents reported fewer days of poor physical or mental health, and social connectedness between neighbors grew. Asthma-friendly homes significantly decreased asthma-related illness among children and adolescents.

INTERPRETATION

Providing affordable, quality housing to low-income families improved individual and neighborhood quality of life. Efforts to create social change and improve the health outcomes for entire populations are more effective when multiple organizations work together to improve neighborhood health.

摘要

背景

许多城市的居民缺乏经济适用的优质住房。经济弱势社区往往贫困率和犯罪率高,提升居民生活质量的机构寥寥无几,步行及其他体育活动的环境也不安全。住房条件恶化会引发与哮喘相关的疾病。我们描述了西雅图西部社区海岬高地的重建情况,以改善其建筑环境,增加社区体育活动,并减少室内哮喘诱发因素。

社区背景

海岬高地是西雅图人口构成最多样化的社区之一。在重建之前,它的基础设施破旧,犯罪率不断上升,室内环境增加了儿童和青少年与哮喘相关疾病的发病几率。海岬高地的居民和合作伙伴制定并实施了一项全面的重建计划,以打造一个可持续的建筑环境,增加户外体育活动,改善室内环境。

方法

我们按照社区准备度模型中的不同变化阶段,对海岬高地的重建进行了回顾性分析。我们还研究了政府与社区团体之间促成海岬高地项目成功的多部门伙伴关系。

结果

社区重建使居民的整体生活质量得到了改善。体育活动增加,居民报告身心健康不佳的天数减少,邻里之间的社会联系增强。适宜哮喘患者居住的房屋显著减少了儿童和青少年与哮喘相关的疾病。

解读

为低收入家庭提供经济适用的优质住房改善了个人和社区的生活质量。当多个组织共同努力改善社区健康状况时,为实现社会变革和改善全体人群健康结果所做的努力会更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a67a/4222786/e03c47e55227/PCD-11-E194s02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a67a/4222786/c37b407154eb/PCD-11-E194s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a67a/4222786/e03c47e55227/PCD-11-E194s02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a67a/4222786/c37b407154eb/PCD-11-E194s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a67a/4222786/e03c47e55227/PCD-11-E194s02.jpg

相似文献

1
Using the community readiness model to examine the built and social environment: a case study of the High Point neighborhood, Seattle, Washington, 2000-2010.运用社区准备度模型审视建成环境与社会环境:以华盛顿州西雅图市海港区社区为例,2000 - 2010年
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Nov 6;11:E194. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.140235.
2
Asthma and the home environment of low-income urban children: preliminary findings from the Seattle-King County healthy homes project.哮喘与低收入城市儿童的家庭环境:西雅图-金县健康家庭项目的初步发现
J Urban Health. 2000 Mar;77(1):50-67. doi: 10.1007/BF02350962.
3
The Seattle-King County healthy homes project: implementation of a comprehensive approach to improving indoor environmental quality for low-income children with asthma.西雅图-金县健康家园项目:为患有哮喘的低收入儿童改善室内环境质量的综合方法的实施
Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Apr;110 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):311-22. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s2311.
4
"The chaos of not knowing": Embodied experiences of waiting for public housing redevelopment and relocation.“不知何去何从的混乱”:等待公共住房重建和搬迁的身体体验。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Oct;359:117266. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117266. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
5
[Child health environment in the context of relocating of camp site families to social housing].[营地家庭搬迁至社会住房背景下的儿童健康环境]
Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015 May-Jun;86(3):152-60. doi: 10.1016/j.rchipe.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
6
Linking social and built environmental factors to the health of public housing residents: a focus group study.将社会与建筑环境因素与公共住房居民健康相联系:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 10;15:351. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1710-9.
7
Slum upgrading strategies involving physical environment and infrastructure interventions and their effects on health and socio-economic outcomes.涉及物理环境和基础设施干预措施的贫民窟改造策略及其对健康和社会经济成果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31(1):CD010067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010067.pub2.
8
Participatory testing and reporting in an environmental-justice community of Worcester, Massachusetts: a pilot project.参与式测试和报告在马萨诸塞州伍斯特市的一个环境正义社区:一个试点项目。
Environ Health. 2010 Jul 6;9:34. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-9-34.
9
"Everything that looks good ain't good!": perspectives on urban redevelopment among persons with a history of injection drug use in Baltimore, Maryland.“外表好看的不一定是好的!”:马里兰州巴尔的摩市有注射吸毒史的人对城市重建的看法。
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Nov;24(6):605-13. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.03.015. Epub 2013 May 3.
10
The Seattle-King County Healthy Homes Project: a randomized, controlled trial of a community health worker intervention to decrease exposure to indoor asthma triggers.西雅图-金县健康家园项目:一项关于社区卫生工作者干预措施以减少室内哮喘诱发因素暴露的随机对照试验。
Am J Public Health. 2005 Apr;95(4):652-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.042994.

引用本文的文献

1
Community Readiness for Drug Abuse Prevention in Two Rural Communities in Enugu State, Nigeria.尼日利亚埃努古州两个农村社区预防药物滥用的社区准备情况。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2020 Oct 25;6:2377960820963758. doi: 10.1177/2377960820963758. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
2
Parental Perspectives of Barriers to Physical Activity in Urban Schoolchildren With Asthma.家长对城市哮喘儿童体力活动障碍的看法。
Acad Pediatr. 2018 Apr;18(3):310-316. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.12.011. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
3
Improving Community Readiness for Change through Coalition Capacity Building: Evidence from a Multi-Site Intervention.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in physical activity and travel behaviors in residents of a mixed-use development.混合用途开发项目居民身体活动和出行行为的变化。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Nov;41(5):504-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.07.016.
2
The Breathe-Easy Home: the impact of asthma-friendly home construction on clinical outcomes and trigger exposure.《呼吸自如的家:哮喘友好型住宅建造对临床结果和触发因素暴露的影响》
Am J Public Health. 2011 Jan;101(1):55-62. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300008.
3
Beyond individual neighborhoods: a geography of opportunity perspective for understanding racial/ethnic health disparities.
通过联盟能力建设提高社区变革准备度:来自多地点干预的证据
J Community Psychol. 2017 May;45(4):486-499. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21860. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
超越个体社区:理解种族/民族健康差异的机会地理视角。
Health Place. 2010 Nov;16(6):1113-23. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Jul 24.
4
A systematic review of housing interventions and health: introduction, methods, and summary findings.住房干预与健康的系统评价:引言、方法和总结性发现。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010 Sep-Oct;16(5 Suppl):S5-10. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181e31d09.
5
High point walking for health: creating built and social environments that support walking in a public housing community.为健康而进行的高峰时段步行:打造支持公共住房社区步行的建筑与社会环境。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Nov;99 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S593-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.164384.
6
Is segregation bad for your health?隔离对健康有害吗?
Epidemiol Rev. 2009;31:178-94. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxp001. Epub 2009 May 23.
7
Dwelling disparities: how poor housing leads to poor health.居住差异:劣质住房如何导致健康不佳。
Environ Health Perspect. 2005 May;113(5):A310-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.113-a310.
8
Community-based participatory research: policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research.基于社区的参与性研究:促进健康研究中伙伴关系方法的政策建议。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2001;14(2):182-97. doi: 10.1080/13576280110051055.
9
Future directions in residential segregation and health research: a multilevel approach.居住隔离与健康研究的未来方向:一种多层次方法
Am J Public Health. 2003 Feb;93(2):215-21. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.2.215.