Ashour Ramsey, Dodson Stephen, Aziz-Sultan M Ali
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Jan;8(1):30-7. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011443. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
Intracranial blister aneurysms are rare lesions that are notoriously more difficult to treat than typical saccular aneurysms. High complication rates associated with surgery have sparked considerable interest in endovascular techniques, though not well-studied, to treat blister aneurysms.
To evaluate our experience using various endovascular approaches to treat blister aneurysms.
All consecutive blister aneurysms treated using an endovascular approach by the study authors over a 3-year period were retrospectively analyzed. A literature review was also performed.
Nine patients with blister aneurysms underwent 11 endovascular interventions. In various combinations, stents were used in 8/11, coils in 5/11, and Onyx in 3/11 procedures. At mean angiographic follow-up of 200 days, 8/9 aneurysms were completely occluded by endovascular means alone requiring no further treatment and 1/9 aneurysms required surgical bypass/trapping after one failed surgical and two failed endovascular treatments. At mean clinical follow-up of 416 days, modified Rankin Scale scores were improved in six patients, stable in two, and worsened in one patient. One complication occurred in 11 procedures (9%), resulting in a permanent neurologic deficit. No unintended endovascular parent vessel sacrifice, intraprocedural aneurysmal ruptures, antiplatelet-related complications, post-treatment aneurysmal re-ruptures, or deaths occurred.
This series highlights both the spectrum and limitations of endovascular techniques currently used to treat blister aneurysms, including a novel application of stent-assisted Onyx embolization. Long-term follow-up and experience in larger studies are required to better define the role of endovascular therapy in the management of these difficult lesions.
颅内泡状动脉瘤是罕见病变,与典型囊状动脉瘤相比,其治疗难度大得多。手术相关的高并发症发生率引发了人们对治疗泡状动脉瘤的血管内技术的浓厚兴趣,尽管该技术尚未得到充分研究。
评估我们使用各种血管内方法治疗泡状动脉瘤的经验。
回顾性分析研究作者在3年期间使用血管内方法治疗的所有连续性泡状动脉瘤。还进行了文献综述。
9例泡状动脉瘤患者接受了11次血管内干预。在各种组合中,8/11的手术使用了支架,5/11使用了弹簧圈,3/11使用了Onyx。平均血管造影随访200天,8/9的动脉瘤仅通过血管内方法完全闭塞,无需进一步治疗,1/9的动脉瘤在一次手术失败和两次血管内治疗失败后需要进行手术搭桥/夹闭。平均临床随访416天,6例患者改良Rankin量表评分改善,2例稳定,1例恶化。11次手术中有1次发生并发症(9%),导致永久性神经功能缺损。未发生意外的血管内母血管牺牲、术中动脉瘤破裂、抗血小板相关并发症、治疗后动脉瘤再破裂或死亡。
本系列研究突出了目前用于治疗泡状动脉瘤的血管内技术的范围和局限性,包括支架辅助Onyx栓塞的新应用。需要进行长期随访和更大规模研究的经验,以更好地确定血管内治疗在这些难治性病变管理中的作用。