Jolles S, Orange J S, Gardulf A, Stein M R, Shapiro R, Borte M, Berger M
Immunodeficiency Centre for Wales, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Clin Exp Immunol. 2015 Feb;179(2):146-60. doi: 10.1111/cei.12485.
Primary antibody deficiencies require lifelong replacement therapy with immunoglobulin (Ig)G to reduce the incidence and severity of infections. Both subcutaneous and intravenous routes of administering IgG can be effective and well tolerated. Treatment regimens can be individualized to provide optimal medical and quality-of-life outcomes in infants, children, adults and elderly people. Frequency, dose, route of administration, home or infusion-centre administration, and the use of self- or health-professional-administered infusion can be tailored to suit individual patient needs and circumstances. Patient education is needed to understand the disease and the importance of continuous therapy. Both the subcutaneous and intravenous routes have advantages and disadvantages, which should be considered in selecting each patient's treatment regimen. The subcutaneous route is attractive to many patients because of a reduced incidence of systemic adverse events, flexibility in scheduling and its comparative ease of administration, at home or in a clinic. Self-infusion regimens, however, require independence and self-reliance, good compliance on the part of the patient/parent and the confidence of the physician and the nurse. Intravenous administration in a clinic setting may be more appropriate in patients with reduced manual dexterity, reluctance to self-administer or a lack of self-reliance, and intravenous administration at home for those with good venous access who prefer less frequent treatments. Both therapy approaches have been demonstrated to provide protection from infections and improve health-related quality of life. Data supporting current options in IgG replacement are presented, and considerations in choosing between the two routes of therapy are discussed.
原发性抗体缺陷需要终身使用免疫球蛋白(Ig)G进行替代治疗,以降低感染的发生率和严重程度。皮下和静脉注射IgG的途径都可能有效且耐受性良好。治疗方案可以个体化,以在婴儿、儿童、成人和老年人中提供最佳的医疗和生活质量结果。给药频率、剂量、途径、家庭或输液中心给药以及自我或医护人员给药的使用都可以根据患者的个体需求和情况进行调整。需要对患者进行教育,使其了解疾病以及持续治疗的重要性。皮下和静脉途径都有优缺点,在选择每位患者的治疗方案时都应予以考虑。皮下途径对许多患者具有吸引力,因为全身不良事件的发生率较低、给药时间安排灵活,且在家庭或诊所给药相对容易。然而,自我输液方案需要患者具备独立性和自理能力,患者/家长良好的依从性以及医生和护士的信心。对于手部灵活性降低、不愿自我给药或缺乏自理能力的患者,在诊所进行静脉给药可能更为合适;对于静脉通路良好且希望减少治疗频率的患者,则可在家中进行静脉给药。两种治疗方法均已证明可预防感染并改善与健康相关的生活质量。本文介绍了支持当前Ig替代治疗选择的数据,并讨论了在两种治疗途径之间进行选择时的注意事项。