Veterans Affairs Palo Alto, GI Endoscopy Unit and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Veterans Affairs Kansas City, Gastroenterology Section and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Gut. 2015 Oct;64(10):1569-77. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307742. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
Diminutive (≤ 5 mm) colorectal polyps are common, and overwhelmingly benign. Routinely, after polypectomy, they are examined pathologically to determine the surveillance intervals. Advances in equipment and techniques, such as narrow-band imaging (NBI) colonoscopy, now permit reliable real-time optical diagnosis.
We conducted a randomised single-masked study involving three institutions to determine whether optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps meets clinical practice standards and reduces the need for histopathology. We randomly assigned eligible patients undergoing routine high-definition colonoscopy to optical diagnosis using near focus versus standard view, using computer-generated block sequence. By validated criteria, we rendered an optical diagnosis and a confidence level (high vs low) for all polyps, using NBI. Our primary endpoint was the number of accurate high-confidence optical diagnoses compared with central blinded pathology in the two groups. We analysed data using intention to treat.
We enrolled 558 subjects, and randomly assigned 281 to near focus and 277 to standard view optical diagnosis. We detected 1309 predominantly diminutive (74.5%) and neoplastic (60.0%) polyps. Endoscopists were significantly more likely, OR 2.2 (95% CI 1.6 to 3.0, p<0.0001), to make a high-confidence optical diagnosis with near focus (85.1%) than standard (72.6%) view. High-confidence diagnoses had 96.4% and 92.0% negative predictive value, respectively. Of all polyps, 75.3% (95% CI71.3% to 78.9%) had a high-confidence accurate prediction using near focus, compared with 63.1% (95% CI 58.5% to 67.6%) using standard view. Optical versus histopathological diagnosis showed excellent agreement between the surveillance intervals, 93.5% in near focus and 92.2% in standard view. The median diagnosis time was 14 s.
Real-time optical diagnosis using NBI colonoscopy may replace the pathology diagnosis for the majority of diminutive colorectal polyps. Using colonoscopy with near focus view increases the confidence level of the optical diagnosis. Optical diagnosis would be a paradigm shift in clinical practice of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01288833.
微小(≤5 毫米)结直肠息肉很常见,绝大多数为良性。息肉切除术后,通常需要进行病理检查以确定随访间隔。窄带成像(NBI)结肠镜等设备和技术的进步,现在可以实现可靠的实时光学诊断。
我们在三家机构进行了一项随机单盲研究,以确定微小结直肠息肉的光学诊断是否符合临床实践标准并减少对组织病理学的需求。我们将符合条件的接受常规高清结肠镜检查的患者随机分配到使用近焦与标准视图的光学诊断,使用计算机生成的块序列。我们使用 NBI 根据验证标准对所有息肉进行光学诊断和置信水平(高或低)。我们的主要终点是比较两组中准确的高置信度光学诊断与中心盲法病理的数量。我们使用意向治疗进行数据分析。
我们共纳入 558 例患者,随机分配 281 例接受近焦光学诊断,277 例接受标准视图光学诊断。我们共检测到 1309 个主要为微小(74.5%)和肿瘤性(60.0%)的息肉。与标准视图(72.6%)相比,近焦(85.1%)时,内镜医生更有可能做出高置信度的光学诊断,比值比(OR)为 2.2(95%置信区间 1.6 至 3.0,p<0.0001)。高置信度诊断的阴性预测值分别为 96.4%和 92.0%。在所有息肉中,使用近焦的高置信度准确预测率为 75.3%(95%置信区间 71.3%至 78.9%),而使用标准视图的预测率为 63.1%(95%置信区间 58.5%至 67.6%)。光学与组织病理学诊断在随访间隔方面具有极好的一致性,近焦组为 93.5%,标准视图组为 92.2%。中位诊断时间为 14 秒。
使用 NBI 结肠镜的实时光学诊断可能替代大多数微小结直肠息肉的病理诊断。使用近焦视图的结肠镜检查可以提高光学诊断的置信度。光学诊断将是结直肠癌症筛查中结肠镜临床实践的范式转变。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01288833。