• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于大肠息肉光学诊断的SIMPLE分类法的临床验证

Clinical validation of the SIMPLE classification for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps.

作者信息

Alaoui Ahmed Amine, Oumedjbeur Kussil, Djinbachian Roupen, Marchand Étienne, Marques Paola N, Bouin Mickael, Bouchard Simon, von Renteln Daniel

机构信息

University of Montreal, Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, QC, Canada.

University of Montreal Hospital Centre Research Center, Gastroenterology, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2021 May;9(5):E684-E692. doi: 10.1055/a-1388-6694. Epub 2021 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1055/a-1388-6694
PMID:33937508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8062223/
Abstract

A novel endoscopic optical diagnosis classification system (SIMPLE) has recently been developed. This study aimed to evaluate the SIMPLE classification in a clinical cohort.  All diminutive and small colorectal polyps found in a cohort of individuals undergoing screening, diagnostic, or surveillance colonoscopies underwent optical diagnosis using image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) and the SIMPLE classification. The primary outcome was the agreement of surveillance intervals determined by optical diagnosis compared with pathology-based results for diminutive polyps. Secondary outcomes included the negative predictive value (NPV) for rectosigmoid adenomas, the percentage of pathology exams avoided, and the percentage of immediate surveillance interval recommendations. Analysis of optical diagnosis for polyps ≤ 10 mm was also performed.  399 patients (median age 62.6 years; 55.6 % female) were enrolled. For patients with at least one polyp ≤ 5 mm undergoing optical diagnosis, agreement with pathology-based surveillance intervals was 93.5 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 91.4-95.6). The NPV for rectosigmoid adenomas was 86.7 % (95 %CI 77.5-93.2). When using optical diagnosis, pathology analysis could be avoided in 61.5 % (95 %CI 56.9-66.2) of diminutive polyps, and post-colonoscopy surveillance intervals could be given immediately to 70.9 % (95 %CI 66.5-75.4) of patients. For patients with at least one ≤ 10 mm polyp, agreement with pathology-based surveillance intervals was 92.7 % (95 %CI 89.7-95.1). NPV for rectosigmoid adenomas ≤ 10 mm was 85.1 % (95 %CI CI 76.3-91.6).  IEE with the SIMPLE classification achieved the quality benchmark for the resect and discard strategy; however, the NPV for rectosigmoid polyps requires improvement.

摘要

一种新型的内镜光学诊断分类系统(SIMPLE)最近已被开发出来。本研究旨在评估临床队列中的SIMPLE分类。在接受筛查、诊断或监测结肠镜检查的个体队列中发现的所有微小和小的结直肠息肉,均采用图像增强内镜检查(IEE)和SIMPLE分类进行光学诊断。主要结局是光学诊断确定的监测间隔与微小息肉基于病理结果的一致性。次要结局包括直肠乙状结肠腺瘤的阴性预测值(NPV)、避免的病理检查百分比以及立即监测间隔建议的百分比。还对≤10mm息肉的光学诊断进行了分析。共纳入399例患者(中位年龄62.6岁;55.6%为女性)。对于至少有一个≤5mm息肉接受光学诊断的患者,与基于病理的监测间隔的一致性为93.5%(95%置信区间[CI]91.4 - 95.6)。直肠乙状结肠腺瘤的NPV为86.7%(95%CI 77.5 - 93.2)。使用光学诊断时,61.5%(95%CI 56.9 - 66.2)的微小息肉可避免病理分析,70.9%(95%CI 66.5 - 75.4)的患者在结肠镜检查后可立即获得监测间隔。对于至少有一个≤10mm息肉的患者,与基于病理的监测间隔的一致性为92.7%(95%CI 89.7 - 95.1)。≤10mm直肠乙状结肠腺瘤的NPV为85.1%(95%CI 76.3 - 91.6)。采用SIMPLE分类的IEE达到了切除并丢弃策略的质量基准;然而,直肠乙状结肠息肉的NPV需要改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1234/8062223/eaaae48b5a90/10-1055-a-1388-6694-i2155ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1234/8062223/b676dc2fc4eb/10-1055-a-1388-6694-i2155ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1234/8062223/eaaae48b5a90/10-1055-a-1388-6694-i2155ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1234/8062223/b676dc2fc4eb/10-1055-a-1388-6694-i2155ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1234/8062223/eaaae48b5a90/10-1055-a-1388-6694-i2155ei2.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical validation of the SIMPLE classification for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps.用于大肠息肉光学诊断的SIMPLE分类法的临床验证
Endosc Int Open. 2021 May;9(5):E684-E692. doi: 10.1055/a-1388-6694. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
2
Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial comparing endoscopic image-enhancing modalities.结肠镜下结直肠息肉光学诊断:内镜图像增强模式的随机对照研究
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Mar;93(3):712-719.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.11.023. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
3
Simplifying Resect and Discard Strategies for Real-Time Assessment of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps.简化切除和丢弃策略以实时评估微小结直肠息肉
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 May;16(5):706-714. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.11.036. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
4
Clinical Validation of BASIC Classification for the Resect and Discard Strategy for Diminutive Colorectal Polyps.微小结直肠息肉切除并丢弃策略的BASIC分类的临床验证
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Sep;18(10):2357-2365.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.12.028. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
5
The location-based resect and discard strategy for diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective clinical study.微小结直肠息肉的基于位置的切除并丢弃策略:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Endoscopy. 2022 Apr;54(4):354-363. doi: 10.1055/a-1546-9169. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
6
Non-optical polyp-based resect and discard strategy: A prospective clinical study.非光学息肉基切除和丢弃策略:一项前瞻性临床研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 May 21;28(19):2137-2147. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i19.2137.
7
Guidance for setting easy-to-adopt competence criteria for optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps: a simulation approach.用于制定易于采用的微小结直肠息肉光学诊断能力标准的指南:一种模拟方法。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Oct;94(4):812-822.e43. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
8
ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps.ASGE 技术委员会的系统评价和荟萃分析评估了 ASGE PIVI 阈值,以实时评估微小结直肠息肉的组织学。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):502.e1-502.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.022. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
9
Real-Time Characterization of Diminutive Colorectal Polyp Histology Using Narrow-Band Imaging: Implications for the Resect and Discard Strategy.使用窄带成像对微小结直肠息肉组织学进行实时特征分析:对切除与丢弃策略的影响
Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb;150(2):406-18. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.10.042. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
10
Optical diagnosis of diminutive polyps in the Dutch Bowel Cancer Screening Program: Are we ready to start?荷兰结直肠癌筛查项目中微小息肉的光学诊断:我们准备好开始了吗?
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Mar;8(3):E257-E265. doi: 10.1055/a-1072-4853. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Advanced Imaging in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Literature Review of the Current State of the Art.胃肠道内镜检查中的先进成像技术:当前技术水平的文献综述
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 4;30(3):175-191. doi: 10.1159/000527083. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Rates of synchronous advanced neoplasia and colorectal cancer in patients with colonic serrated lesions.结直肠锯齿状病变患者的同步高级别肿瘤和结直肠癌的发生率。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5150-5157. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09974-z. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Rates of Incomplete Resection of 1- to 20-mm Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.1-20mm 结直肠息肉不完全切除率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Sep;159(3):904-914.e12. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.018. Epub 2020 May 8.
2
Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.结肠镜检查和息肉切除术后的随访建议:美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组的共识更新
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Mar;91(3):463-485.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.014. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
3
Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.
结肠镜检查和息肉切除术后的随访建议:美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组的共识更新
Gastroenterology. 2020 Mar;158(4):1131-1153.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.026. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
4
Optical diagnosis for diminutive colorectal polyps: time to implement?
Endoscopy. 2020 Jan;52(1):13-14. doi: 10.1055/a-1060-2956. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
5
Adherence to post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.息肉切除术后监测指南的依从性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endoscopy. 2019 Jul;51(7):673-683. doi: 10.1055/a-0865-2082. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
6
Should We Resect and Discard Low Risk Diminutive Colon Polyps.我们应该切除并丢弃低风险微小结肠息肉吗?
Clin Endosc. 2019 May;52(3):239-246. doi: 10.5946/ce.2018.136. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
7
Optical diagnosis expanded to small polyps: post-hoc analysis of diagnostic performance in a prospective multicenter study.光学诊断扩大至小息肉:前瞻性多中心研究中诊断性能的事后分析。
Endoscopy. 2019 Mar;51(3):244-252. doi: 10.1055/a-0759-1605. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
8
Risk of Malignancy in Adenomas Detected During Screening Colonoscopy.筛查性结肠镜检查中发现的腺瘤的恶变风险。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov;16(11):1754-1761. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.043. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
9
Development and validation of the SIMPLE endoscopic classification of diminutive and small colorectal polyps.发展和验证微小和小结直肠息肉的 SIMPLE 内镜分类。
Endoscopy. 2018 Aug;50(8):779-789. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-100791. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
10
Effects of Training and Feedback on Accuracy of Predicting Rectosigmoid Neoplastic Lesions and Selection of Surveillance Intervals by Endoscopists Performing Optical Diagnosis of Diminutive Polyps.培训和反馈对行光学诊断小息肉的内镜医师预测直肠乙状结肠肿瘤性病变准确性和监测间期选择的影响。
Gastroenterology. 2018 May;154(6):1682-1693.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.063. Epub 2018 Feb 6.