Boquin Mandy, Smith-Simpson Sarah, Donovan Sharon M, Lee Soo-Yeun
Univ. of Illinois, 905 S. Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A. Dept. of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, U.S.A, Nestlé/Gerber Nutrition, Fremont, MI, USA.
J Food Sci. 2014 Dec;79(12):S2523-32. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12698. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
Picky eating has been investigated through numerous surveys and food recalls, but few studies have applied in-home meal evaluations as a method to investigate behaviors and food preferences of children perceived by their parent to be a picky eater (PE) or nonpicky eater (NPE). A 2-wk in-home meal study was completed to investigate differences in PE and NPE mealtime behaviors and food selections using real-time parental observations. Parents (n = 170) and their 2- to 4-y-old children (83 PE and 87 NPE) evaluated 5 standardized meals in-home. Parents recorded their child's and their own hedonic liking of the products and completed an assessment of their child's behavior and consumption at each meal. Significant differences were found between perceived PE and NPE children for all 16 behaviors assessed. On average, perceived NPE were assessed to consume a higher percentage of the meal served and to have higher acceptance scores for most of the foods evaluated. Some foods, though, like breaded chicken and plain pasta, were liked equally by PE and NPE. Several significant differences in hedonic liking were revealed when PE children were compared to their parents. Yet, few differences in liking occurred between NPE children and their parents or between the 2 parental groups. Because study participants evaluated meals real-time rather than memory recall, the differences and similarities found between perceived PE and NPE may be considered direct experiential evidence with reduced subjective bias as created when subjects recall past experiences. Thus, findings from this study can provide the foundation to establish an objective definition and classification of PE and NPE.
挑食现象已通过众多调查和食物召回情况进行了研究,但很少有研究将家庭用餐评估作为一种方法,来调查被父母认为是挑食者(PE)或非挑食者(NPE)的儿童的行为和食物偏好。一项为期两周的家庭用餐研究完成了,该研究使用实时家长观察来调查挑食者和非挑食者在用餐时的行为差异以及食物选择情况。170名家长及其2至4岁的孩子(83名挑食者和87名非挑食者)在家中对5份标准化餐食进行了评估。家长记录了孩子和他们自己对这些产品的享乐喜好,并完成了对孩子每餐行为和食量的评估。在所评估的所有16种行为中,被认为是挑食者和非挑食者的孩子之间存在显著差异。平均而言,被认为是非挑食者的孩子被评估为吃掉了更高比例的提供的餐食,并且对大多数评估食物的接受度得分更高。然而,有些食物,如面包屑鸡肉和原味意大利面,挑食者和非挑食者同样喜欢。将挑食的孩子与其父母进行比较时,发现了享乐喜好方面的几个显著差异。然而,非挑食的孩子与其父母之间或两个家长群体之间在喜好方面几乎没有差异。由于研究参与者是实时评估餐食,而不是通过记忆回忆,因此在被认为是挑食者和非挑食者之间发现的差异和相似之处可以被视为直接的经验证据,减少了受试者回忆过去经历时产生的主观偏差。因此,本研究的结果可以为建立挑食者和非挑食者的客观定义和分类提供基础。