Liu Yan, Gao Yanfei
Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300192, People's Republic of China Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
J R Soc Interface. 2015 Jan 6;12(102):20141042. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.1042.
Biological adhesive contacts are usually of hierarchical structures, such as the clustering of hundreds of sub-micrometre spatulae on keratinous hairs of gecko feet, or the clustering of molecular bonds into focal contacts in cell adhesion. When separating these interfaces, releasable adhesion can be accomplished by asymmetric alignment of the lowest scale discrete bonds (such as the inclined spatula that leads to different peeling force when loading in different directions) or by elastic anisotropy. However, only two-dimensional contact has been analysed for the latter method (Chen & Gao 2007 J. Mech. Phys. Solids 55, 1001-1015 (doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2006.10.008)). Important questions such as the three-dimensional contact morphology, the maximum to minimum pull-off force ratio and the tunability of releasable adhesion cannot be answered. In this work, we developed a three-dimensional cohesive interface model with fictitious viscosity that is capable of simulating the de-adhesion instability and the peripheral morphology before and after the onset of instability. The two-dimensional prediction is found to significantly overestimate the maximum to minimum pull-off force ratio. Based on an interface fracture mechanics analysis, we conclude that (i) the maximum and minimum pull-off forces correspond to the largest and smallest contact stiffness, i.e. 'stiff-adhere and compliant-release', (ii) the fracture toughness is sensitive to the crack morphology and the initial contact shape can be designed to attain a significantly higher maximum-to-minimum pull-off force ratio than a circular contact, and (iii) since the adhesion is accomplished by clustering of discrete bonds or called bridged crack in terms of fracture mechanics terminology, the above conclusions can only be achieved when the bridging zone is significantly smaller than the contact size. This adhesion-fracture analogy study leads to mechanistic predictions that can be readily used to design biomimetics and releasable adhesives.
生物粘附接触通常具有层次结构,例如壁虎脚上角质毛发上数百个亚微米级刚毛的聚集,或者细胞粘附中分子键聚集成粘着斑。当分离这些界面时,可通过最低尺度离散键的不对称排列(例如倾斜的刚毛,在不同方向加载时会导致不同的剥离力)或弹性各向异性来实现可释放粘附。然而,对于后一种方法,仅分析了二维接触情况(Chen & Gao,2007年,《固体力学物理杂志》55卷,1001 - 1015页(doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2006.10.008))。诸如三维接触形态、最大与最小拉脱力之比以及可释放粘附的可调性等重要问题无法得到解答。在这项工作中,我们开发了一种具有虚拟粘度的三维粘性界面模型,该模型能够模拟脱粘不稳定性以及不稳定性发生前后的周边形态。结果发现二维预测显著高估了最大与最小拉脱力之比。基于界面断裂力学分析,我们得出以下结论:(i)最大和最小拉脱力分别对应最大和最小接触刚度,即“硬粘附和软释放”;(ii)断裂韧性对裂纹形态敏感,并且初始接触形状可以设计成比圆形接触获得显著更高的最大与最小拉脱力之比;(iii)由于粘附是通过离散键的聚集实现的,或者用断裂力学术语来说是通过桥接裂纹实现的,只有当桥接区远小于接触尺寸时,上述结论才能成立。这种粘附 - 断裂类比研究得出了一些机理预测,可直接用于设计仿生材料和可释放粘合剂。