Bibi Shahida, Alblawi Saeed, Velchuru Vamsi, Thripuraneni Gopichand, Quinteros Francisco, Coralic Jasna, Marecik Slawomir, Park John, Prasad Leela M
Department of Colorectal Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL, USA.
JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00182.
The Enseal (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Blue Ash, Ohio) tissue-sealing device has proven efficacy for ligation of vessels<7 mm in diameter, even with significant supraphysiologic bursting pressures. We aimed to evaluate the safety of Enseal in porcine vessels>7 mm.
The lumbar aortas of pigs that were euthanized for unrelated procedures were harvested. A 5- to 6-cm segment of aorta was sealed using the Enseal device. The opposite end was attached to a pressure-testing device to measure pressures at leak or bursting. The bivariate Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship between diameter and bursting pressure. One-way analysis of variance was used to determine differences between the groups of vessels on the basis of their diameter.
Ninety samples of 5-cm aorta segments were used to assess bursting pressure. The median diameter was 14 mm (range, 7-18) and bursting pressure was 85 mm Hg (range, 24-650). The Pearson test showed a negative correlation between vessel diameter and bursting pressure (P=.25). One-way analysis of variance did not show any significant difference between vessel diameters grouped by size (P=.517), and neither did the Scheffe post hoc test when comparing diameter with bursting pressure; 31% of specimens failed to seal.
Bursting pressures are low and inconsistent after tissue sealing with the Enseal device in porcine vessels>7 mm. These vessels also demonstrated a higher rate of failure to seal. The histologic results of the aorta segments (ie, a low collagen-elastin ratio) may be the cause of the low bursting pressures.
已经证实,Ethicon Endo-Surgery公司(位于俄亥俄州蓝灰市)生产的Enseal组织封闭装置在结扎直径小于7毫米的血管时具有疗效,即便在承受显著高于生理水平的爆破压力时也是如此。我们旨在评估Enseal在直径大于7毫米的猪血管中的安全性。
收集因无关手术而安乐死的猪的腰主动脉。使用Enseal装置封闭一段5至6厘米长的主动脉。另一端连接到压力测试装置,以测量渗漏或爆破时的压力。采用双变量Pearson相关性分析来确定直径与爆破压力之间的关系。使用单因素方差分析来确定基于直径分组的血管组之间的差异。
使用90个5厘米长的主动脉段样本评估爆破压力。中位直径为14毫米(范围为7至18毫米),爆破压力为85毫米汞柱(范围为24至650毫米汞柱)。Pearson检验显示血管直径与爆破压力之间呈负相关(P = 0.25)。单因素方差分析未显示按大小分组的血管直径之间存在任何显著差异(P = 0.517),在比较直径与爆破压力时,Scheffe事后检验也未显示差异;31%的标本未能封闭。
使用Enseal装置对直径大于7毫米的猪血管进行组织封闭后,爆破压力较低且不一致。这些血管的封闭失败率也较高。主动脉段的组织学结果(即低胶原-弹性蛋白比率)可能是爆破压力低的原因。