Owsley Cynthia, McGwin Gerald, Lee David J, Lam Byron L, Friedman David S, Gower Emily W, Haller Julia A, Hark Lisa A, Saaddine Jinan
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham2Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;133(2):174-81. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.4652.
The use of a nonmydriatic camera for retinal imaging combined with the remote evaluation of images at a telemedicine reading center has been advanced as a strategy for diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening, particularly among patients with diabetes mellitus from ethnic/racial minority populations with low utilization of eye care.
To examine the rate and types of DR identified through a telemedicine screening program using a nonmydriatic camera, as well as the rate of other ocular findings.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional study (Innovative Network for Sight [INSIGHT]) was conducted at 4 urban clinic or pharmacy settings in the United States serving predominantly ethnic/racial minority and uninsured persons with diabetes. Participants included persons aged 18 years or older who had type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus and presented to the community-based settings.
The percentage of DR detection, including type of DR, and the percentage of detection of other ocular findings.
A total of 1894 persons participated in the INSIGHT screening program across sites, with 21.7% having DR in at least 1 eye. The most common type of DR was background DR, which was present in 94.1% of all participants with DR. Almost half (44.2%) of the sample screened had ocular findings other than DR; 30.7% of the other ocular findings were cataract.
In a DR telemedicine screening program in urban clinic or pharmacy settings in the United States serving predominantly ethnic/racial minority populations, DR was identified on screening in approximately 1 in 5 persons with diabetes. The vast majority of DR was background, indicating high public health potential for intervention in the earliest phases of DR when treatment can prevent vision loss. Other ocular conditions were detected at a high rate, a collateral benefit of DR screening programs that may be underappreciated.
使用非散瞳相机进行视网膜成像,并结合在远程医疗阅读中心对图像进行远程评估,已被作为一种糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)筛查策略而推广,尤其是在眼保健利用率低的少数族裔/种族糖尿病患者中。
研究通过使用非散瞳相机的远程医疗筛查项目所识别出的DR的发生率和类型,以及其他眼部检查结果的发生率。
设计、地点和参与者:在美国4个城市诊所或药房环境中进行了一项横断面研究(视力创新网络[INSIGHT]),主要服务于少数族裔/种族且未参保的糖尿病患者。参与者包括18岁及以上患有1型或2型糖尿病并前往社区机构就诊的人群。
DR检测的百分比,包括DR的类型,以及其他眼部检查结果的检测百分比。
共有1894人参与了各站点的INSIGHT筛查项目,其中21.7%的人至少一只眼睛患有DR。最常见的DR类型是背景性DR,在所有患有DR的参与者中占94.1%。几乎一半(44.2%)接受筛查的样本有除DR以外的眼部检查结果;其他眼部检查结果中有30.7%是白内障。
在美国主要服务少数族裔/种族人群的城市诊所或药房环境中的DR远程医疗筛查项目中,约五分之一的糖尿病患者在筛查中被发现患有DR。绝大多数DR是背景性的,这表明在DR的最早阶段进行干预具有很高的公共卫生潜力,因为此时治疗可以预防视力丧失。其他眼部疾病的检出率很高,这是DR筛查项目的一个附带益处,可能未得到充分重视。