Suppr超能文献

成人根龋治疗中V类洞修复体的失败率——一项系统评价

Failure rates of class V restorations in the management of root caries in adults - a systematic review.

作者信息

Hayes Martina, Brady Paul, Burke Francis M, Allen P Finbarr

机构信息

University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Gerodontology. 2016 Sep;33(3):299-307. doi: 10.1111/ger.12167. Epub 2014 Nov 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to compare cumulative failure rates of different restorative materials in carious class V lesions on the root surfaces of adult patients.

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of root caries is set to increase in the coming years as a result of ageing of the population and a concomitant reduction in levels of edentulousness. Evidence is needed to assist practitioners to select the most appropriate restorative material for use in these lesions.

METHODS

A search of the literature was undertaken using the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL and OpenSIGLE using keywords relevant to the search question. Two review authors conducted the electronic search independently, and any conflict was resolved by discussion. The references quoted in the full text articles extracted were hand searched for any further eligible studies.

RESULTS

Sixty non-duplicate citations were screened. Following review of the titles, abstracts, texts and application of the pre-determined inclusion/exclusion criteria, five studies remained.

CONCLUSION

There is a need for more research in this area as many of the studies identified in this systematic review treated post-radiation, xerostomic patients which are not typical of the general population. Increased adherence to CONSORT guidelines for reporting is also advised to facilitate future systematic review and meta-analysis in this area.

摘要

目的

本系统评价的目的是比较不同修复材料用于成年患者根面龋损Ⅴ类洞的累积失败率。

背景

由于人口老龄化以及随之而来的无牙率降低,预计未来几年根龋患病率将会上升。需要证据来帮助从业者选择最适合用于这些龋损的修复材料。

方法

使用与搜索问题相关的关键词,通过PubMed、Embase、CENTRAL和OpenSIGLE电子数据库进行文献检索。两位综述作者独立进行电子检索,如有冲突通过讨论解决。对全文文章中引用的参考文献进行手工检索,以查找任何其他符合条件的研究。

结果

筛选出60篇非重复文献。在对标题、摘要、正文进行评审并应用预先确定的纳入/排除标准后,最终纳入5项研究。

结论

该领域需要更多研究,因为本系统评价中确定的许多研究纳入的是接受过放疗、口干的患者,这些患者并非普通人群的典型代表。还建议更多地遵循CONSORT报告指南,以促进该领域未来的系统评价和荟萃分析。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验