Pérez-Hernández Isabel A, Palacios Rosario, Mayorga Marisa, González-Doménech Carmen M, Castaño Manuel, Rivero Antonio, Del Arco Alfonso, Lozano Fernando, Santos Jesús
Infectious Diseases, Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Malaga, Spain.
Infectious Diseases, Hospital Carlos Haya, Malaga, Spain.
J Int AIDS Soc. 2014 Nov 2;17(4 Suppl 3):19795. doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.4.19795. eCollection 2014.
Rilpivirine (RPV) has a better lipid profile than efavirenz (EFV) in naïve patients (1). Switching to RPV may be convenient for many patients, while maintaining a good immunovirological control (2). The aim of this study was to analyze lipid changes in HIV-patients at 24 weeks after switching to Eviplera® (emtricitabine/RPV/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate [FTC/RPV/TDF]).
Retrospective, multicentre study of a cohort of asymptomatic HIV-patients who switched from a regimen based on 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI)+protease inhibitor (PI)/non nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or ritonavir boosted PI monotherapy to Eviplera® during February-December, 2013; all had undetectable HIV viral load for ≥3 months prior to switching. Patients with previous failures on antiretroviral therapy (ART) including TDF and/or FTC/3TC, with genotype tests showing resistance to components of Eviplera®, or who had changed the third drug of the ART during the study period were excluded. Changes in lipid profile and cardiovascular risk (CVR), and efficacy and safety at 24 weeks were analyzed.
Among 305 patients included in the study, 298 were analyzed (7 cases were excluded due to lack of data). Men 81.2%, mean age 44.5 years, 75.8% of HIV sexually transmitted. 233 (78.2%) patients switched from a regimen based on 2 NRTI+NNRTI (90.5% EFV/FTC/TDF). The most frequent reasons for switching were central nervous system (CNS) adverse events (31.0%), convenience (27.6%) and metabolic disorders (23.2%). At this time, 293 patients have reached 24 weeks: 281 (95.9%) have continued Eviplera®, 6 stopped it (3 adverse events, 2 virologic failures, 1 discontinuation) and 6 have been lost to follow up. Lipid profiles of 283 cases were available at 24 weeks and mean (mg/dL) baseline vs 24 weeks are: total cholesterol (193 vs 169; p=0.0001), HDL-c (49 vs 45; p=0.0001), LDL-c (114 vs 103; p=0.001), tryglycerides (158 vs 115; p=0.0001), total cholesterol to HDL-c ratio (4.2 vs 4.1; p=0.3). CVR decreased (8.7 vs 7.5%; p= 0.0001). CD4 counts were similar to baseline (653 vs 674 cells/µL; p=0.08), and 274 (96.8%) patients maintained viral suppression.
At 24 weeks after switching to Eviplera®, lipid profile and CVR improved while maintaining a good immunovirological control. Most subjects switched to Eviplera® from a regimen based on NNRTI, mainly EFV/FTC/TDF. CNS adverse events, convenience and metabolic disorders were the most frequent reasons for switching.
在初治患者中,利匹韦林(RPV)的血脂情况优于依非韦伦(EFV)(1)。对许多患者而言,换用RPV可能较为便利,同时能维持良好的免疫病毒学控制(2)。本研究旨在分析转换为艾生特(恩曲他滨/利匹韦林/替诺福韦酯富马酸盐[FTC/RPV/TDF])后24周时HIV患者的血脂变化。
对一组无症状HIV患者进行回顾性多中心研究,这些患者于2013年2月至12月期间从基于2种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NRTI)+蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)/非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTI)的方案或利托那韦增强的PI单药治疗转换为艾生特;转换前所有患者的HIV病毒载量连续≥3个月检测不到。排除既往抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)失败(包括对TDF和/或FTC/3TC治疗失败)、基因型检测显示对艾生特成分耐药或在研究期间更换了ART方案中第三种药物的患者。分析24周时的血脂变化、心血管风险(CVR)以及疗效和安全性。
纳入研究的305例患者中,298例进行了分析(7例因数据缺失被排除)。男性占81.2%,平均年龄44.5岁,75.8%的HIV通过性传播。233例(78.2%)患者从基于2种NRTI+NNRTI的方案转换而来(90.5%为EFV/FTC/TDF)。转换的最常见原因是中枢神经系统(CNS)不良事件(31.0%)、便利性(27.6%)和代谢紊乱(23.2%)。此时,293例患者达到24周:281例(95.9%)继续使用艾生特,6例停药(3例因不良事件,2例因病毒学失败,1例因自行停药),6例失访。283例患者在24周时可获得血脂数据,基线与24周时的均值(mg/dL)分别为:总胆固醇(193 vs 169;p=0.0001)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-c)(49 vs 4