*Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Institute for Behavioral Health, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA †Abt Associates, Cambridge, MA ‡US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, Fort Detrick, MD.
Med Care. 2014 Dec;52(12 Suppl 5):S83-90. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000227.
Recent reports reinforce the widespread interest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), not only among military personnel with combat-related disorders, but also among providers who are pressed to respond to patient demand for these therapies. However, an understanding of utilization of CAM therapies in this population is lacking.
The goals of this study are to synthesize the content of self-report population surveys with information on use of CAM in military and veteran populations, assess gaps in knowledge, and suggest ways to address current limitations.
The research team conducted a literature review of population surveys to identify CAM definitions, whether military status was queried, the medical and psychological conditions queried, and each specific CAM question. Utilization estimates specific to military/veterans were summarized and limitations to knowledge was classified.
Seven surveys of CAM utilization were conducted with military/veteran groups. In addition, 7 household surveys queried military status, although there was no military/veteran subgroup analysis. Definition of CAM varied widely limiting cross-survey analysis. Among active duty and Reserve military, CAM use ranged between 37% and 46%. Survey estimates do not specify CAM use that is associated with a medical or behavioral health condition.
Comparisons between surveys are hampered due to variation in methodologies. Too little is known about reasons for using CAM and conditions for which it is used. Additional information could be drawn from current surveys with additional subgroup analysis, and future surveys of CAM should include military status variable.
最近的报告强调了人们对补充和替代医学(CAM)的广泛兴趣,不仅在与战斗相关的疾病的军人中,而且在被要求满足这些疗法需求的医务人员中也是如此。然而,人们对这一人群中 CAM 疗法的使用情况了解甚少。
本研究的目的是综合自我报告的人群调查内容和有关军人和退伍军人使用 CAM 的信息,评估知识差距,并提出解决当前限制的方法。
研究小组对人群调查进行了文献回顾,以确定 CAM 的定义、是否询问了军人身份、询问了哪些医疗和心理状况以及每个特定的 CAM 问题。总结了特定于军人/退伍军人的利用估计,并对知识的局限性进行了分类。
对军人/退伍军人进行了 7 项 CAM 利用调查。此外,有 7 项家庭调查询问了军人身份,但没有进行军人/退伍军人亚组分析。CAM 的定义差异很大,限制了跨调查分析。在现役和预备役军人中,CAM 的使用率在 37%至 46%之间。调查估计并未指定与医疗或行为健康状况相关的 CAM 使用情况。
由于方法学的差异,调查之间的比较受到阻碍。对于使用 CAM 的原因和使用 CAM 的条件知之甚少。可以从当前调查中进行额外的亚组分析来获取更多信息,未来的 CAM 调查应包括军人身份变量。