Lahaie Marie-Andrée, Amsel Rhonda, Khalifé Samir, Boyer Stephanie, Faaborg-Andersen Marie, Binik Yitzchak M
Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3A 1B1, Canada.
Arch Sex Behav. 2015 Aug;44(6):1537-50. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0430-z. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
Fear has been suggested as the crucial diagnostic variable that may distinguish vaginismus from dyspareunia. Unfortunately, this has not been systematically investigated. The primary purpose of this study, therefore, was to investigate whether fear as evaluated by subjective, behavioral, and psychophysiological measures could differentiate women with vaginismus from those with dyspareunia/provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) and controls. A second aim was to re-examine whether genital pain and pelvic floor muscle tension differed between vaginismus and dyspareunia/PVD sufferers. Fifty women with vaginismus, 50 women with dyspareunia/PVD, and 43 controls participated in an experimental session comprising a structured interview, pain sensitivity testing, a filmed gynecological examination, and several self-report measures. Results demonstrated that fear and vaginal muscle tension were significantly greater in the vaginismus group as compared to the dyspareunia/PVD and no-pain control groups. Moreover, behavioral measures of fear and vaginal muscle tension were found to discriminate the vaginismus group from the dyspareunia/PVD and no-pain control groups. Genital pain did not differ significantly between the vaginismus and dyspareunia/PVD groups; however, genital pain was found to discriminate both clinical groups from controls. Despite significant statistical differences on fear and vaginal muscle tension variables between women suffering from vaginismus and dyspareunia/PVD, a large overlap was observed between these conditions. These findings may explain the great difficulty health professionals experience in attempting to reliably differentiate vaginismus from dyspareunia/PVD. The implications of these data for the new DSM-5 diagnosis of Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder are discussed.
恐惧被认为是区分阴道痉挛和性交疼痛的关键诊断变量。不幸的是,尚未对此进行系统研究。因此,本研究的主要目的是调查通过主观、行为和心理生理测量评估的恐惧是否能区分患有阴道痉挛的女性与患有性交疼痛/激发性前庭疼痛(PVD)的女性及对照组。第二个目的是重新审视阴道痉挛患者与性交疼痛/PVD患者之间的生殖器疼痛和盆底肌肉紧张程度是否存在差异。50名患有阴道痉挛的女性、50名患有性交疼痛/PVD的女性和43名对照组参与者参加了一个实验环节,该环节包括结构化访谈、疼痛敏感性测试、妇科检查录像以及多项自我报告测量。结果表明,与性交疼痛/PVD组和无疼痛对照组相比,阴道痉挛组的恐惧和阴道肌肉紧张程度明显更高。此外,发现恐惧和阴道肌肉紧张的行为测量能够区分阴道痉挛组与性交疼痛/PVD组和无疼痛对照组。阴道痉挛组和性交疼痛/PVD组之间的生殖器疼痛没有显著差异;然而,发现生殖器疼痛能够区分这两个临床组与对照组。尽管患有阴道痉挛和性交疼痛/PVD的女性在恐惧和阴道肌肉紧张变量上存在显著统计学差异,但在这些情况之间观察到有很大重叠。这些发现可能解释了健康专业人员在试图可靠区分阴道痉挛和性交疼痛/PVD时所遇到的巨大困难。讨论了这些数据对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM-5)中生殖器盆腔疼痛/插入障碍新诊断的意义。