• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

35岁及以上女性宫腔内人工授精周期中高纯度人绝经期促性腺激素与重组促卵泡激素加重组促黄体生成素的比较:一项随机对照试验

Highly purified hMG versus recombinant FSH plus recombinant LH in intrauterine insemination cycles in women ≥35 years: a RCT.

作者信息

Moro Francesca, Scarinci Elisa, Palla Carola, Romani Federica, Familiari Alessandra, Tropea Anna, Leoncini Emanuele, Lanzone Antonio, Apa Rosanna

机构信息

Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2015 Jan;30(1):179-85. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu302. Epub 2014 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/deu302
PMID:25398971
Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Is the treatment with recombinant FSH (rFSH) plus recombinant LH (rLH) more effective than highly purified (HP)-hMG in terms of ongoing pregnancy rate (PR) in women ≥35 years of age undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The ongoing PR was not significantly different in women treated with rFSH plus rLH or with HP-hMG.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Although previous studies have shown beneficial effects of the addition of LH activity to FSH, in terms of PR in patients aged over 34 years having ovulation induction, no studies have compared two different gonadotrophin preparations containing LH activity in women ≥35 years of age in IUI cycles.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A single-centre RCT was performed between May 2012 and September 2013 with 579 women ≥35 years of age undergoing IUI cycles. The patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups, rFSH in combination with rLH group or HP-hMG (Meropur) group, by giving them a code number from a computer generated randomization list, in order of enrolment. The randomization visit took place on the first day of ovarian stimulation.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Five hundred and seventy-nine patients with unexplained infertility or mild male factor undergoing IUI cycles were recruited in a university hospital setting. All women were enrolled in this study only for one cycle of treatment. Five hundred and seventy-nine cycles were included in the final analysis. Two hundred and ninety patients were treated with rFSH in combination with rLH and 289 patients were treated with HP-hMG. The ovarian stimulation cycle started on the third day of the menstrual cycle and the starting gonadotrophin doses used were 150 IU/day of rFSH plus 150 IU/day of rLH or 150 IU/day of HP-hMG. The drug dose was adjusted according to the individual follicular response. A single IUI per cycle was performed 34-36 h after hCG injection.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The main outcome measures were ongoing PR and number of interrupted cycles for high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Ongoing pregnancy rates were 48/290 (17.3%) in the recombinant group versus 35/289 (12.2%) in the HP-hMG group [(odds ratio (OR) 1.50, 95% CI 0.94-2.41, P = 0.09]. The number of interrupted cycles for high risk of OHSS was 13/290 (4.5%) in the rFSH plus rLH group and 2/289 (0.7%) in the HP-hMG group (OR 6.73, 95% CI 1.51-30.12, P = 0.013).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: One of the limitations of this study was the early closure and the ongoing PR could be overestimated. Both patient and gynaecologist were informed of the assigned treatment.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our results demonstrated the lack of differences in terms of ongoing PR between recombinant product and HP-hMG, in women ≥35 years undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IUI cycles. HP-hMG was safer than recombinant gonadotrophin concerning the risk of OHSS.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: None.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01604044.

摘要

研究问题

对于年龄≥35岁接受宫腔内人工授精(IUI)周期治疗的女性,重组促卵泡激素(rFSH)联合重组促黄体生成素(rLH)治疗在持续妊娠率(PR)方面是否比高度纯化(HP)的人绝经期促性腺激素(hMG)更有效?

简要回答

接受rFSH联合rLH治疗或HP-hMG治疗的女性,其持续妊娠率无显著差异。

已知信息

尽管先前的研究已表明在促卵泡激素中添加促黄体生成素活性具有有益效果,但就年龄超过34岁接受促排卵治疗的患者的妊娠率而言,尚无研究比较过年龄≥35岁接受IUI周期治疗的女性使用的两种含促黄体生成素活性的不同促性腺激素制剂。

研究设计、规模、持续时间:2012年5月至2013年9月在单中心进行了一项随机对照试验(RCT),共有579名年龄≥35岁的女性接受IUI周期治疗。通过从计算机生成的随机列表中为患者分配一个代码编号,并按入组顺序将患者随机分配至两组之一,即rFSH联合rLH组或HP-hMG(Meropur)组。随机分组访视在卵巢刺激的第一天进行。

参与者/材料、环境、方法:在一所大学医院招募了579例不明原因不孕或轻度男性因素导致不孕且接受IUI周期治疗的患者。所有女性仅纳入一个治疗周期。最终分析纳入了579个周期。290例患者接受rFSH联合rLH治疗,289例患者接受HP-hMG治疗。卵巢刺激周期在月经周期的第三天开始,起始促性腺激素剂量为每天150 IU的rFSH加每天150 IU的rLH或每天150 IU的HP-hMG。药物剂量根据个体卵泡反应进行调整。每个周期在注射人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)后34 - 36小时进行一次IUI。

主要结果及机遇的作用

主要观察指标为持续妊娠率和因卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)高风险而中断的周期数。重组组的持续妊娠率为48/290(17.3%),而HP-hMG组为35/289(12.2%)[比值比(OR)1.50,95%置信区间(CI)0.94 - 2.41, P = 0.09]。rFSH加rLH组因OHSS高风险而中断的周期数为13/290(4.5%),HP-hMG组为2/289(0.7%)(OR 6.73,95% CI 1.51 - 30.12,P = 0.013)。

局限性、谨慎理由:本研究的局限性之一是提前结束,持续妊娠率可能被高估。患者和妇科医生均知晓所分配的治疗方案。

研究结果的更广泛影响

我们的结果表明,对于年龄≥35岁接受控制性卵巢刺激以进行IUI周期治疗的女性,重组产品与HP-hMG在持续妊娠率方面无差异。就OHSS风险而言,HP-hMG比重组促性腺激素更安全。

研究资金/利益冲突:无。

试验注册号

NCT01604044。

相似文献

1
Highly purified hMG versus recombinant FSH plus recombinant LH in intrauterine insemination cycles in women ≥35 years: a RCT.35岁及以上女性宫腔内人工授精周期中高纯度人绝经期促性腺激素与重组促卵泡激素加重组促黄体生成素的比较:一项随机对照试验
Hum Reprod. 2015 Jan;30(1):179-85. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu302. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
2
Corifollitropin alfa followed by highly purified HMG versus recombinant FSH in young poor ovarian responders: a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial.Corifollitropin alfa 序贯高纯度 HMG 与重组 FSH 在年轻卵巢低反应患者中的应用:一项多中心随机对照临床试验。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Nov 1;32(11):2225-2233. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex296.
3
Gonadotrophins for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.用于多囊卵巢综合征女性促排卵的促性腺激素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 16;1(1):CD010290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010290.pub3.
4
Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus clomiphene citrate in subfertile couples treated with intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial.低剂量人绝经期促性腺激素与枸橼酸氯米酚在宫腔内人工授精治疗不孕夫妇中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2015 May;30(5):1079-88. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev062. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
5
Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alone during GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation in patients aged ≥35 years: a randomized controlled trial.重组卵泡刺激素和重组促黄体生成素联合 GnRH 拮抗剂方案与单独使用重组卵泡刺激素方案在年龄≥35 岁患者卵巢刺激中的随机对照研究。
Hum Reprod. 2015 May;30(5):1188-95. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev038. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
6
Gonadotrophins for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome.用于多囊卵巢综合征女性促排卵的促性腺激素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 9(9):CD010290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010290.pub2.
7
Lyophilised hMG versus rFSH in women with unexplained infertility undergoing a controlled ovarian stimulation with intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomised study.冻干尿促性素(hMG)与重组卵泡刺激素(rFSH)治疗不明原因不孕患者宫腔内人工授精控制性卵巢刺激的前瞻性随机研究。
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2010 Jun;26(6):429-34. doi: 10.3109/09513591003632175.
8
Recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) and recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) for ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles.重组促黄体生成素(rLH)和重组促卵泡生成素(rFSH)用于体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射周期中的卵巢刺激。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 24;5(5):CD005070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005070.pub3.
9
Addition of highly purified HMG after corifollitropin alfa in antagonist-treated poor ovarian responders: a pilot study.在拮抗剂处理的卵巢反应不良者中添加高纯度 HMG 后加用果纳芬:一项初步研究。
Hum Reprod. 2013 May;28(5):1254-60. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det045. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
10
The effectiveness and safety of recombinant human LH to support follicular development induced by recombinant human FSH in WHO group I anovulation: evidence from a multicentre study in Spain.重组人促黄体生成素支持重组人促卵泡激素诱导的卵泡发育在世界卫生组织I型无排卵中的有效性和安全性:来自西班牙一项多中心研究的证据
Hum Reprod. 2001 Dec;16(12):2525-32. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.12.2525.

引用本文的文献

1
Ovarian Stimulation Altered Uterine Fluid Extracellular Vesicles miRNA Affecting Implantation in Rats.卵巢刺激改变子宫液细胞外囊泡微小RNA影响大鼠着床
Reprod Sci. 2024 Jun;31(6):1683-1694. doi: 10.1007/s43032-023-01448-w. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
2
A retrospective, matched case-control study of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol.回顾性、匹配病例对照研究:在 GnRH 拮抗剂方案中控制性卵巢超刺激时,重组 LH 与 hMG 对 FSH 的补充作用。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 15;13:931756. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.931756. eCollection 2022.
3
The İmpact of Gonadotropin Type on Controlled Ovarian Stimulation and İntrauterine İnsemination Cycle Outcomes.
促性腺激素类型对控制性卵巢刺激及宫内人工授精周期结局的影响。 需注意,原文中“İ”应是“i”的错误写法,翻译时按照正确的英文单词进行了翻译。
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2022 Jan-Mar;15(1):51-57. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_177_21. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
4
Agents for ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in ovulatory women with infertility.用于排卵障碍性不孕患者宫腔内人工授精的促排卵药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 5;11(11):CD005356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005356.pub3.
5
Effects of letrozole combined with human menopausal gonadotrophin in ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination cycles.来曲唑联合人绝经期促性腺激素在子宫内人工授精周期卵巢刺激中的作用。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Dec;7(23):771. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.11.58.
6
Probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis of controlled ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH plus recombinant LH vs. human menopausal gonadotropin for women undergoing IVF.采用重组卵泡刺激素加重组人黄体生成素控制性卵巢刺激与人类绝经期促性腺激素对接受 IVF 的女性进行的概率成本效益分析。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018 Jul 18;16(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0386-2.
7
Effect of Gonadotropin Types and Indications on Homologous Intrauterine Insemination Success: A Study from 1251 Cycles and a Review of the Literature.促性腺激素类型和适应证对同源宫腔内人工授精成功的影响:来自 1251 个周期的研究及文献复习。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:3512784. doi: 10.1155/2017/3512784. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
8
A Comparison of Outcomes from Fertilization Cycles Stimulated with Follicle Stimulating Hormone Plus either Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone or Human Menopausal Gonadotropins in Subjects Treated with Long Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonist Protocols.在接受长效促性腺激素释放激素激动剂方案治疗的受试者中,比较卵泡刺激素联合重组促黄体生成素或人绝经期促性腺激素刺激的受精周期结局。
Int J Fertil Steril. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(2):79-84. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2017.4759. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
9
Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the "Personalized" Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis.在“个性化”医学时代,单独使用促卵泡激素(FSH)、FSH + 促黄体生成素、人绝经期促性腺激素或FSH + 人绒毛膜促性腺激素对辅助生殖技术结局的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017 Jun 1;8:114. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00114. eCollection 2017.
10
Profile of follitropin alpha/lutropin alpha combination for the stimulation of follicular development in women with severe luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone deficiency.重组促卵泡素α/重组促黄体素α组合用于刺激严重促黄体生成素和促卵泡生成素缺乏女性卵泡发育的概况
Int J Womens Health. 2016 May 25;8:169-79. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S88904. eCollection 2016.