• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Revascularization in stable coronary artery disease.

作者信息

Sherwood Matthew W, Peterson Eric D

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina2Associate Editor, JAMA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2014 Nov 19;312(19):2028-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.9314.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2014.9314
PMID:25399278
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Revascularization in stable coronary artery disease.稳定型冠状动脉疾病的血运重建
JAMA. 2014 Nov 19;312(19):2028-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.9314.
2
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel disease.多支血管病变中冠状动脉搭桥术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的对比
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jun;174(6):1007. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.776.
3
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel disease.多支血管病变中冠状动脉搭桥术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jun;174(6):1006-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.773.
4
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel disease--reply.多支血管病变中冠状动脉搭桥术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗——答复
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jun;174(6):1007-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.762.
5
Evolving treatment options in coronary artery disease.冠状动脉疾病不断发展的治疗选择。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Feb 1;174(2):231. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.7492.
6
ACP Journal Club. Review: CABG reduces long-term mortality and morbidity more than PCI in multivessel coronary disease.《美国内科医师学会杂志俱乐部》述评：在多支血管冠状动脉疾病中，冠状动脉搭桥术比经皮冠状动脉介入治疗更能降低长期死亡率和发病率。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Apr 15;160(8):JC9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-160-8-201404150-02009.
7
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term mortality and morbidity in multivessel disease: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of the arterial grafting and stenting era.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对多支血管病变患者长期死亡率和发病率的影响：动脉搭桥和支架时代随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Feb 1;174(2):223-30. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12844.
8
The FREEDOM trial: a definitive answer to coronary artery bypass grafting or stents in patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease.FREEDOM试验：糖尿病合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉搭桥术或支架置入术的确切答案。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Dec;44(6):978-9. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt450. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
9
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Left Main Disease: Pre- and Post-EXCEL (Evaluation of XIENCE Everolimus Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization) and NOBLE (Nordic-Baltic-British Left Main Revascularization Study) Era.左主干疾病的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗：EXCEL（评价依维莫司洗脱支架 XIENCE 与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干血运重建效果）和 NOBLE（北欧-波罗的海-英国左主干血运重建研究）时代之前和之后。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun;10(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.004792.
10
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.冠状动脉搭桥术与药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病：随机试验的荟萃分析
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 15;241:142-148. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.04.015. Epub 2017 Apr 6.