Suppr超能文献

院外心脏骤停后生存率的提高和自动体外除颤器的使用。

Improved survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and use of automated external defibrillators.

机构信息

From the Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (M.T.B., S.G.B., P.C.M.H., J.A.Z., M.H., D.A.v.H., A.B., J.G.P.T., H.L.T., R.W.K.); Interuniversity Cardiology Institute Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands (A.B.).

出版信息

Circulation. 2014 Nov 18;130(21):1868-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010905.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent years, a wider use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) to treat out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was advocated in The Netherlands. We aimed to establish whether survival with favorable neurologic outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has significantly increased, and, if so, whether this is attributable to AED use.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a population-based cohort study, including patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from cardiac causes between 2006 and 2012, excluding emergency medical service-witnessed arrests. We determined survival status at each stage (to emergency department, to admission, and to discharge) and examined temporal trends using logistic regression analysis with year of resuscitation as an independent variable. By adding each covariable subsequently to the regression model, we investigated their impact on the odds ratio of year of resuscitation. Analyses were performed according to initial rhythm (shockable versus nonshockable) and AED use. Rates of survival with favorable neurologic outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest increased significantly (N=6133, 16.2% to 19.7%; P for trend=0.021), although solely in patients presenting with a shockable initial rhythm (N=2823; 29.1% to 41.4%; P for trend<0.001). In this group, survival increased at each stage but was strongest in the prehospital phase (odds ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.06-1.16]). Rates of AED use almost tripled during the study period (21.4% to 59.3%; P for trend <0.001), thereby decreasing time from emergency call to defibrillation-device connection (median, 9.9 to 8.0 minutes; P<0.001). AED use statistically explained increased survival with favorable neurologic outcome by decreasing the odds ratio of year of resuscitation to a nonsignificant 1.04.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased AED use is associated with increased survival in patients with a shockable initial rhythm. We recommend continuous efforts to introduce or extend AED programs.

摘要

背景

近年来,荷兰提倡更广泛地使用自动体外除颤器(AED)来治疗院外心脏骤停。我们旨在确定院外心脏骤停后具有良好神经功能结局的存活率是否显著增加,如果是,是否归因于 AED 的使用。

方法和结果

我们进行了一项基于人群的队列研究,纳入了 2006 年至 2012 年期间由心脏原因引起的院外心脏骤停患者,不包括急救医疗服务见证的骤停。我们确定了每个阶段(到达急诊室、入院和出院)的生存状况,并使用逻辑回归分析,以复苏年份作为独立变量,检查时间趋势。通过随后将每个协变量添加到回归模型中,我们研究了它们对复苏年份比值比的影响。根据初始节律(可电击与不可电击)和 AED 使用情况进行分析。院外心脏骤停后具有良好神经功能结局的存活率显著增加(N=6133,16.2%至 19.7%;趋势 P 值=0.021),尽管仅在具有可电击初始节律的患者中(N=2823;29.1%至 41.4%;趋势 P 值<0.001)。在该组中,每个阶段的生存率均有所提高,但在院前阶段最强(优势比,1.11[95%CI,1.06-1.16])。在此期间,AED 的使用几乎增加了两倍(21.4%至 59.3%;趋势 P 值<0.001),从而缩短了从急救电话到除颤设备连接的时间(中位数,9.9 分钟至 8.0 分钟;P<0.001)。AED 的使用通过将复苏年份的比值比降低至无统计学意义的 1.04,从而解释了具有良好神经功能结局的存活率增加。我们建议继续努力引入或扩展 AED 计划。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验