Suppr超能文献

自动体外除颤器和院内心搏骤停:澳大利亚教学医院的患者生存率和设备性能。

Automated external defibrillators and in-hospital cardiac arrest: patient survival and device performance at an Australian teaching hospital.

机构信息

St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Intensive Care, Inpatient Services Building, Level 1, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2011 Dec;82(12):1537-42. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.06.025. Epub 2011 Jun 30.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the effect of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) on patient survival and to describe the performance of AEDs after in-hospital cardiac arrest.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data were analysed for cardiac arrests in the general patient care areas of a teaching hospital during the 3 years before and the 3 years after the deployment of AEDs. The association between availability of an AED and survival to hospital discharge was assessed using multivariate logistic regression. AED performance during automated management of the initial rhythms was assessed using information captured by the AEDs.

RESULTS

There were 84 cardiac arrests in the AED period and 82 in the pre-AED period. Patient and event characteristics were similar in each period. The initial rhythm was shockable in 16% of cases. Return of spontaneous circulation was higher in the AED period (54% vs. 35%, P=0.02) but the proportion of hospital survivors in each period was similar (22% vs. 19%, P=0.56). The adjusted odds ratio for hospital survival when an AED was available was 1.22 (95% CI 0.53-2.84, P=0.64). An AED was applied in 77/84 (92%) possible cases. Median interruption to chest compressions was 12s (inter-quartile range 12-13). An automated shock was delivered in 8/13 (62%) possible cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Availability of AEDs was not independently associated with hospital survival. Shockable presenting rhythms were not common and, in keeping with the manufacturer's specifications, the AEDs did not shock all potentially shockable rhythms. The hands-off time associated with automated rhythm management was considerable.

摘要

目的

评估自动体外除颤器(AED)对患者生存率的影响,并描述院内心脏骤停后 AED 的性能。

方法

对教学医院普通患者护理区 3 年前和部署 AED 后 3 年内发生的心脏骤停进行前瞻性收集数据进行分析。使用多变量逻辑回归评估 AED 可用性与出院生存率之间的关联。使用 AED 捕获的信息评估初始节律自动管理期间 AED 的性能。

结果

AED 期间发生了 84 例心脏骤停,AED 前期间发生了 82 例。每个时期的患者和事件特征相似。初始节律为可电击的占 16%。AED 期间自主循环恢复率较高(54%对 35%,P=0.02),但每个时期的医院幸存者比例相似(22%对 19%,P=0.56)。当 AED 可用时,医院生存率的调整后优势比为 1.22(95%CI 0.53-2.84,P=0.64)。77/84(92%)可能的病例应用了 AED。中位数中断胸部按压时间为 12s(四分位距 12-13)。在 13 例可能的病例中,有 8 例(62%)自动给予电击。

结论

AED 的可用性与医院生存率无独立相关性。出现可电击的节律并不常见,并且符合制造商的规格,AED 并未电击所有潜在可电击的节律。与自动节律管理相关的脱手时间相当长。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验