Chan Paul S, McNally Bryan, Tang Fengming, Kellermann Arthur
From Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (P.S.C., F.T.); the Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University, and Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA (B.M.); and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD (A.K.).
Circulation. 2014 Nov 18;130(21):1876-82. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009711.
Despite intensive efforts over many years, the United States has made limited progress in improving rates of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Recently, national organizations, such as the American Heart Association, have focused on promoting bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, use of automated external defibrillators, and other performance improvement efforts.
Using the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES), a prospective clinical registry, we identified 70 027 U.S. patients who experienced an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between October 2005 and December 2012. Using multilevel Poisson regression, we examined temporal trends in risk-adjusted survival. After adjusting for patient and cardiac arrest characteristics, risk-adjusted rates of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival increased from 5.7% in the reference period of 2005 to 2006 to 7.2% in 2008 (adjusted risk ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.43; P<0.001). Survival improved more modestly to 8.3% in 2012 (adjusted risk ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.70; P<0.001). This improvement in survival occurred in both shockable and nonshockable arrest rhythms (P for interaction=0.22) and was also accompanied by better neurological outcomes among survivors (P for trend=0.01). Improved survival was attributable to both higher rates of prehospital survival, where risk-adjusted rates increased from 14.3% in 2005 to 2006 to 20.8% in 2012 (P for trend<0.001), and in-hospital survival (P for trend=0.015). Rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator use modestly increased during the study period and partly accounted for prehospital survival trends.
Data drawn from a large subset of U.S communities suggest that rates of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have improved among sites participating in a performance improvement registry.
尽管多年来付出了巨大努力,但美国在提高院外心脏骤停存活率方面进展有限。最近,诸如美国心脏协会等全国性组织一直致力于推广旁观者心肺复苏术、自动体外除颤器的使用以及其他改善医疗表现的举措。
利用“提高心脏骤停存活率注册系统(CARES)”这一前瞻性临床注册系统,我们确定了2005年10月至2012年12月期间在美国经历院外心脏骤停的70027例患者。我们使用多水平泊松回归分析了风险调整后存活率的时间趋势。在对患者和心脏骤停特征进行调整后,院外心脏骤停的风险调整后存活率从2005年至2006年参考期的5.7%上升至2008年的7.2%(调整风险比为1.27;95%置信区间为1.12 - 1.43;P<0.001)。到2012年,存活率适度提高至8.3%(调整风险比为1.47;95%置信区间为1.26 - 1.70;P<0.001)。这种存活率的提高在可电击心律和不可电击心律的心脏骤停中均有出现(交互作用P值 = 0.22),并且幸存者的神经功能结局也有所改善(趋势P值 = 0.01)。存活率的提高归因于院外存活率的上升,其中风险调整后存活率从2005年至2006年的14.3%增至2012年的20.8%(趋势P值<0.001),以及院内存活率的提高(趋势P值 = 0.015)。在研究期间,旁观者心肺复苏术和自动体外除颤器的使用比例适度增加,这在一定程度上解释了院外存活率的趋势。
来自美国大量社区的数据表明,参与医疗表现改善注册系统的地区,院外心脏骤停的存活率有所提高。