Suppr超能文献

一项随机、研究者设盲、平行组研究,旨在评估15%壬二酸凝胶与0.1%阿达帕林凝胶在成年女性痤疮治疗及维持治疗中的疗效和安全性。

A randomized investigator-blind parallel-group study to assess efficacy and safety of azelaic acid 15% gel vs. adapalene 0.1% gel in the treatment and maintenance treatment of female adult acne.

作者信息

Thielitz A, Lux A, Wiede A, Kropf S, Papakonstantinou E, Gollnick H

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Apr;29(4):789-96. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12823. Epub 2014 Nov 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Growing numbers of post-adolescent females are suffering from treatment-resistant or relapsing adult acne forms, therefore requiring the definition of safe and effective treatment options for this burdening disease.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of azelaic acid 15% gel (AzA) vs. no treatment during maintenance therapy of female adult acne and to compare its efficacy and safety vs. adapalene 0.1% gel (AD) during a 9-month period (3-month treatment and 6-month maintenance treatment).

METHODS

A total of 55 women between 18 and 45 years with adult acne were included in this investigator-blind trial and randomized into three groups receiving AzA gel b.i.d. for 9 months (AzA9M, n = 17) or AzA gel b.i.d. for 3 months followed by a 6-month observational phase (AzA3M, n = 19) or AD gel once daily for 9 months (AD9M, n = 19). Parameters of efficacy, safety and patient-related factors were analysed.

RESULTS

The reduction in lesion counts, severity and Dermatology Life Quality Index score was significant (P < 0.05) and comparable between groups during the treatment phase, while dryness and scaling were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in group AzA9M vs. AD9M. During maintenance, AzA9M was superior to AzA3M in the control of inflammatory lesions (P = 0.008) and total lesions (P = 0.014) at week 24. From week 12 to week 36, a mild relative increase in inflammatory lesions could be observed in all groups. In AzA3M, this increase exceeded that of AzA9M by 23.1% (P = 0.109), while the difference of total lesions diverged to 30.8% (P = 0.038). No significant differences could be detected between AzA9M and AD9M. Group AzA9M was non-inferior to AD9M (non-inferiority margin of 50% for the confidence limit for the relative effect) in the control of inflammatory acne lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

AzA15% gel is a safe and effective treatment and maintenance treatment of female adult acne with non-inferior efficacy to AD 0.1% gel in the control of inflammatory acne.

摘要

背景

越来越多的青春期后女性患有难治性或复发性成人痤疮,因此需要为这种负担沉重的疾病确定安全有效的治疗方案。

目的

评估15%壬二酸凝胶(AzA)与不治疗相比在女性成人痤疮维持治疗中的疗效,并在9个月期间(3个月治疗期和6个月维持治疗期)比较其与0.1%阿达帕林凝胶(AD)的疗效和安全性。

方法

本研究者盲法试验共纳入55名18至45岁的成人痤疮女性,随机分为三组,分别接受AzA凝胶每日两次,共9个月(AzA9M组,n = 17),或AzA凝胶每日两次,共3个月,随后进入6个月观察期(AzA3M组,n = 19),或AD凝胶每日一次,共9个月(AD9M组,n = 19)。分析疗效、安全性和患者相关因素参数。

结果

在治疗阶段,各组的皮损计数、严重程度和皮肤病生活质量指数评分均显著降低(P < 0.05)且具有可比性,而AzA9M组的干燥和脱屑情况显著低于AD9M组(P < 0.05)。在维持期,AzA9M组在第24周时在控制炎性皮损(P = 0.008)和总皮损(P = 0.014)方面优于AzA3M组。从第12周到第36周,所有组均观察到炎性皮损有轻度相对增加。在AzA3M组,这种增加比AzA9M组高出23.1%(P = 0.109),而总皮损的差异为30.8%(P = 0.038)。AzA9M组和AD9M组之间未检测到显著差异。AzA9M组在控制炎性痤疮皮损方面不劣于AD9M组(相对效应置信限的非劣效界值为50%)。

结论

15%AzA凝胶是女性成人痤疮安全有效的治疗和维持治疗方法,在控制炎性痤疮方面疗效不劣于0.1%AD凝胶。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验