Love Jennifer C, Derrick Sharon M, Wiersema Jason M, Peters Charles
Office of Chief Medical Examiner, 401 E St. SW, Washington, DC, 20024.
J Forensic Sci. 2015 Jan;60 Suppl 1:S21-6. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12650. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
Microscopic saw mark analysis is a well published and generally accepted qualitative analytical method. However, little research has focused on identifying and mitigating potential sources of error associated with the method. The presented study proposes the use of classification trees and random forest classifiers as an optimal, statistically sound approach to mitigate the potential for error of variability and outcome error in microscopic saw mark analysis. The statistical model was applied to 58 experimental saw marks created with four types of saws. The saw marks were made in fresh human femurs obtained through anatomical gift and were analyzed using a Keyence digital microscope. The statistical approach weighed the variables based on discriminatory value and produced decision trees with an associated outcome error rate of 8.62-17.82%.
微观锯痕分析是一种已被广泛发表且普遍接受的定性分析方法。然而,很少有研究专注于识别和减轻与该方法相关的潜在误差来源。本研究提出使用分类树和随机森林分类器,作为一种优化的、统计学上合理的方法,以减轻微观锯痕分析中变异性误差和结果误差的可能性。该统计模型应用于用四种类型的锯制作的58个实验锯痕。锯痕制作于通过遗体捐赠获得的新鲜人类股骨上,并使用基恩士数码显微镜进行分析。该统计方法根据判别值对变量进行加权,并生成了相关结果误差率为8.62 - 17.82%的决策树。