Galárraga Omar, Sosa-Rubí Sandra G, González Andrea, Badial-Hernández Florentino, Conde-Glez Carlos J, Juárez-Figueroa Luis, Bautista-Arredondo Sergio, Kuo Caroline, Operario Don, Mayer Kenneth H
Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Cuernavaca, Mexico;
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Cuernavaca, Mexico.
J Int AIDS Soc. 2014 Nov 14;17(1):19218. doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.1.19218. eCollection 2014.
The objective of this article is to present the rationale and baseline results for a randomized controlled pilot trial using economic incentives to reduce HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk among male sex workers (MSWs) in Mexico City.
Participants (n=267) were tested and treated for STIs (chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis and HIV) and viral hepatitis (hepatitis B and C), received HIV and STI prevention education and were randomized into four groups: (1) control, (2) medium conditional incentive ($50/six months), (3) high conditional incentive ($75/six months) and (4) unconditional incentive ($50/six months). In the conditional arms, incentives were contingent upon testing free of new curable STIs (chlamydia, gonorrhoea and syphilis) at follow-up assessments.
Participants' mean age was 25 years; 8% were homeless or lived in a shelter, 16% were unemployed and 21% lived in Mexico City less than 5 years. At baseline, 38% were living with HIV, and 32% tested positive for viral hepatitis or at least one STI (other than HIV). Participants had a mean of five male clients in the previous week; 18% reported condomless sex with their last client. For 37%, sex work was their main occupation and was conducted mainly on the streets (51%) or in bars/discotheques (24%) and hotels (24%). The average price for a sex transaction was $25 with a 35% higher payment for condomless sex.
The findings suggest that economic incentives are a relevant approach for HIV prevention among MSWs, given the market-based inducements for unprotected sex. This type of targeted intervention seems to be justified and should continue to be explored in the context of combination prevention efforts.
本文旨在介绍一项随机对照试验的基本原理和基线结果,该试验利用经济激励措施降低墨西哥城男性性工作者感染艾滋病毒和性传播感染(STI)的风险。
参与者(n = 267)接受了性传播感染(衣原体、淋病、梅毒和艾滋病毒)和病毒性肝炎(乙型和丙型肝炎)的检测与治疗,接受了艾滋病毒和性传播感染预防教育,并被随机分为四组:(1)对照组,(2)中等条件激励组(每六个月50美元),(3)高等条件激励组(每六个月75美元),(4)无条件激励组(每六个月50美元)。在有条件的组中,激励措施取决于在后续评估中检测未感染新的可治愈性传播感染(衣原体、淋病和梅毒)。
参与者的平均年龄为25岁;8%无家可归或住在收容所,16%失业,21%在墨西哥城居住不到5年。基线时,38%感染艾滋病毒,32%病毒性肝炎检测呈阳性或感染至少一种性传播感染(艾滋病毒除外)。参与者前一周平均有五个男性客户;18%报告与最后一个客户无保护性行为。37%的人以性工作为主要职业,主要在街头(51%)、酒吧/迪斯科舞厅(24%)和酒店(24%)进行性工作。一次性交易的平均价格为25美元,无保护性行为的报酬高出35%。
研究结果表明,鉴于无保护性行为存在基于市场的诱因,经济激励措施是预防男性性工作者感染艾滋病毒的一种相关方法。这种有针对性的干预措施似乎是合理的,应在综合预防工作的背景下继续探索。