Stevenson Claire E, Kleibeuker Sietske W, de Dreu Carsten K W, Crone Eveline A
Brain and Development Lab, Developmental and Educational Psychology Department, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands ; Methodology and Statistics Department, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.
Brain and Development Lab, Developmental and Educational Psychology Department, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Oct 29;8:827. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00827. eCollection 2014.
Creativity commonly refers to the ability to generate ideas, solutions, or insights that are novel yet feasible. The ability to generate creative ideas appears to develop and change from childhood to adulthood. Prior research, although inconsistent, generally indicates that adults perform better than adolescents on the alternative uses task (AUT), a commonly used index of creative ideation. The focus of this study was whether performance could be improved by practicing alternative uses generation. We examined the effectiveness of creative ideation training in adolescents (13-16 years, N = 71) and adults (23-30 years, N = 61). Participants followed one of three types of training, each comprising eight 20-min practice sessions within 2 week time: (1) alternative uses generation (experimental condition: creative ideation); (2) object characteristic generation (control condition: general ideation); (3) rule-switching (control condition: rule-switching). Progression in fluency, flexibility, originality of creative ideation was compared between age-groups and training conditions. Participants improved in creative ideation and cognitive flexibility, but not in general ideation. Participants in all three training conditions became better in fluency and originality on the AUT. With regard to originality, adolescents benefitted more from training than adults, although this was not specific for the creative ideation training condition. These results are interpreted in relation to (a) the different underlying processes targeted in the three conditions and (b) developmental differences in brain plasticity with increased sensitivity to training in adolescents. In sum, the results show that improvement can be made in creative ideation and supports the hypothesis that adolescence is a developmental stage of increased flexibility optimized for learning and explorative behavior.
创造力通常是指产生新颖且可行的想法、解决方案或见解的能力。产生创造性想法的能力似乎会从童年到成年不断发展和变化。先前的研究虽然并不一致,但总体表明,在替代用途任务(AUT)中,成年人的表现优于青少年,AUT是一种常用的创造性思维指标。本研究的重点是,通过练习生成替代用途,表现是否可以得到改善。我们考察了针对青少年(13 - 16岁,N = 71)和成年人(23 - 30岁,N = 61)的创造性思维训练的效果。参与者接受三种类型训练中的一种,每种训练在两周内包括八个20分钟的练习环节:(1)生成替代用途(实验条件:创造性思维);(2)生成物体特征(对照条件:一般思维);(3)规则转换(对照条件:规则转换)。我们比较了不同年龄组和训练条件下创造性思维在流畅性、灵活性和独创性方面的进展。参与者在创造性思维和认知灵活性方面有所提高,但在一般思维方面没有提高。所有三种训练条件下的参与者在AUT上的流畅性和独创性都变得更好。在独创性方面,青少年比成年人从训练中受益更多,不过这并非创造性思维训练条件所特有。这些结果与以下两方面有关:(a)三种条件下所针对的不同潜在过程;(b)大脑可塑性的发育差异,青少年对训练的敏感性更高。总之,结果表明创造性思维可以得到改善,并支持了这样一种假设,即青春期是一个为学习和探索行为而优化的、灵活性增强的发育阶段。