Griggs Lauren, Fahimi Farbod
Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, 35899 Alabama, USA.
Open Biomed Eng J. 2014 Oct 30;8:93-105. doi: 10.2174/1874120701408010093. eCollection 2014.
Commercially available robotic prosthetic arms currently use independent joint control. An alternative controller involving only control of the hand in a Cartesian frame rather than controlling each joint independently is proposed and tested. An experimental 4DOF robotic arm was used as the platform for testing the proposed control approach. As opposed to joint control, Cartesian control requires the solution to the inverse kinematics problem. The inverse kinematics solution was developed for the robotic arm using the extended Jacobian method. The two control methodologies, joint control and Cartesian control, were tested on five able-bodied human subjects. Improvement of one control methodology over the other was measured by the time it took for the subjects to complete a simple motor task. The timed trial results indicated that Cartesian control was both more intuitive and more effective than joint control. So, the results suggest that much improvement can be achieved by using the proposed Cartesian control methodology.
目前市售的机器人假肢手臂采用独立关节控制。本文提出并测试了一种仅在笛卡尔坐标系中控制手部而非独立控制每个关节的替代控制器。以一个实验性的四自由度机器人手臂作为测试所提控制方法的平台。与关节控制不同,笛卡尔控制需要求解逆运动学问题。利用扩展雅可比方法为机器人手臂开发了逆运动学解。在五名身体健全的人类受试者身上对关节控制和笛卡尔控制这两种控制方法进行了测试。通过受试者完成一项简单运动任务所需的时间来衡量一种控制方法相对于另一种的改进程度。定时试验结果表明,笛卡尔控制比关节控制更直观、更有效。因此,结果表明使用所提的笛卡尔控制方法可以实现很大的改进。