光谱光学相干断层扫描分析方法的定量比较：对评论的回复
Quantitative comparison of analysis methods for spectroscopic optical coherence tomography: reply to comment.
作者信息
Bosschaart Nienke, van Leeuwen Ton G, Aalders Maurice C G, Faber Dirk J
机构信息
Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
出版信息
Biomed Opt Express. 2014 Aug 12;5(9):3034-5. doi: 10.1364/BOE.5.003034. eCollection 2014 Sep 1.
We reply to the comment by Kraszewski et al on "Quantitative comparison of analysis methods for spectroscopic optical coherence tomography." We present additional simulations evaluating the proposed window function. We conclude that our simulations show good qualitative agreement with the results of Kraszewski, in support of their conclusion that SOCT optimization should include window shape, next to choice of window size and analysis algorithm.
我们回复了Kraszewski等人对“光谱光学相干断层扫描分析方法的定量比较”的评论。我们给出了评估所提出窗函数的额外模拟。我们得出结论，我们的模拟与Kraszewski的结果在定性上有很好的一致性，支持了他们的结论，即光谱光学相干断层扫描的优化除了窗口大小和分析算法的选择外，还应包括窗口形状。
Zotero 插件