Suppr超能文献

在生物化学教学模块结束时,通过小组讨论来识别错误并进行纠正,以此作为一种复习练习。

Identification of mistakes and their correction by a small group discussion as a revision exercise at the end of a teaching module in biochemistry.

作者信息

Bobby Zachariah, Nandeesha H, Sridhar M G, Soundravally R, Setiya Sajita, Babu M Sathish, Niranjan G

机构信息

Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry 605006, India - Department of Biochemistry.

出版信息

Natl Med J India. 2014 Jan-Feb;27(1):22-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Graduate medical students often get less opportunity for clarifying their doubts and to reinforce their concepts after lecture classes. The Medical Council of India (MCI) encourages group discussions among students. We evaluated the effect of identifying mistakes in a given set of wrong statements and their correction by a small group discussion by graduate medical students as a revision exercise.

METHODS

At the end of a module, a pre-test consisting of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) was conducted. Later, a set of incorrect statements related to the topic was given to the students and they were asked to identify the mistakes and correct them in a small group discussion. The effects on low, medium and high achievers were evaluated by a post-test and delayed post-tests with the same set of MCQs.

RESULTS

The mean post-test marks were significantly higher among all the three groups compared to the pre-test marks. The gain from the small group discussion was equal among low, medium and high achievers. The gain from the exercise was retained among low, medium and high achievers after 15 days.

CONCLUSION

Identification of mistakes in statements and their correction by a small group discussion is an effective, but unconventional revision exercise in biochemistry.

摘要

背景

医学研究生在课程讲授之后,往往很少有机会澄清疑问并强化概念。印度医学委员会(MCI)鼓励学生进行小组讨论。我们评估了医学研究生通过小组讨论来识别给定错误陈述中的错误并加以纠正这一复习练习的效果。

方法

在一个模块结束时,进行了一次包含多项选择题(MCQ)的预测试。之后,向学生提供一组与该主题相关的错误陈述,要求他们在小组讨论中识别错误并进行纠正。通过使用同一组MCQ进行后测和延迟后测,评估对低、中、高成绩者的影响。

结果

与预测试成绩相比,所有三组的后测平均成绩均显著更高。低、中、高成绩者从小组讨论中获得的收益相同。15天后,低、中、高成绩者都保留了此次练习的收获。

结论

通过小组讨论识别陈述中的错误并加以纠正,是生物化学中一种有效但非传统的复习练习。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验