Tucker C B, Mintline E M, Banuelos J, Walker K A, Hoar B, Varga A, Drake D, Weary D M
Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis 95616
Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis 95616.
J Anim Sci. 2014 Dec;92(12):5674-82. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7887. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
Hot-iron branding is painful for cattle, but little is known about the duration of or effective methods to control this pain. This work quantified pain sensitivity and healing in branded and unbranded animals. In addition, the effects of a single injection of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) were also considered; this has been suggested as practical method of mitigating pain in the hours after the procedure. Calves (mean±SE, 126±2.2 d and 112±2.8 kg) were hot-iron branded and allocated to 1 of 4 treatments: branded with or without flunixin meglumine (intravenous; 1.1 mg/kg) and unbranded with or without this NSAID (n=12/treatment). Pain sensitivity was assessed by applying a known and increasing force with a von Frey anesthesiometer in the center of the brand (or equivalent area in nonbranded treatments) until animals showed a behavioral response. Healing was measured with a 6-point scale (1=fresh brand and 6=no scabbing and fully repigmented). These measures, along with weight gain and surface temperature, were recorded 1, 2, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 56, and 71 d after branding. Lying behavior was recorded with loggers from the day before to d 27 after branding. Brand wounds were more painful than nonbranded tissue (P<0.001). These differences were most pronounced in the days immediately after branding (e.g., d 7; 113±36 g of force for Brand vs. 449±23 g force for No brand, mean±SE) but persisted until d 71 (380±37 g force for Brand vs. 453±23 g of force for No brand, mean±SE); only 67% of brands were fully regimented or healed by this time. The first fully healed brand was identified 8 wk after the procedure. Giving a single injection of flunixin had no brand-specific effects on sensitivity, surface temperature, or healing but improved weight gain in the days after branding in all treated groups (flunixin×brand×day, P<0.001). Flunixin-treated animals also spent 0.7 h less time lying down on the day of branding but tended to spend more time lying on d 15 and 26 after the procedure. The magnitude of these differences is small, less than the day-to-day variation, and not brand specific. In summary, brand wounds take at least 8 wk to heal. These wounds remain painful for a least this long, and a single injection of NSAID has no measurable effect in mitigating pain associated with branding, even in days immediately after the procedure.
热烙铁打烙印对牛来说很痛苦,但对于这种疼痛的持续时间或有效的控制方法却知之甚少。这项研究对打过烙印和未打过烙印的动物的疼痛敏感性和愈合情况进行了量化。此外,还考虑了单次注射非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)的效果;有人建议这是在打烙印后的数小时内减轻疼痛的一种实用方法。犊牛(平均±标准误,126±2.2日龄,112±2.8千克)被用热烙铁打烙印,并被分配到4种处理中的1种:打烙印时使用或不使用氟尼辛葡甲胺(静脉注射;1.1毫克/千克),未打烙印时使用或不使用这种NSAID(每组n = 12)。通过使用von Frey麻醉计在烙印中心(或未打烙印处理中的等效区域)施加已知且逐渐增加的压力来评估疼痛敏感性,直到动物表现出行为反应。用6分制量表测量愈合情况(1 = 新鲜烙印,6 = 无结痂且完全重新着色)。在打烙印后的第1、2、7、14、21、28、35、42、56和71天记录这些指标,以及体重增加和体表温度。从打烙印前一天到打烙印后第27天,用记录仪记录躺卧行为。烙印伤口比未打烙印的组织更疼(P<0.001)。这些差异在打烙印后的 immediately 几天最为明显(例如,第7天;烙印组施加113±36克力,未打烙印组施加449±23克力,平均±标准误),但一直持续到第71天(烙印组施加380±37克力,未打烙印组施加453±23克力,平均±标准误);此时只有67%的烙印完全愈合或痊愈。在该操作8周后发现第一个完全愈合的烙印。单次注射氟尼辛对敏感性、体表温度或愈合没有特定于烙印的影响,但在所有处理组中,在打烙印后的几天内改善了体重增加(氟尼辛×烙印×天数,P<0.001)。接受氟尼辛治疗的动物在打烙印当天躺卧时间也少0.7小时,但在操作后的第15天和第26天躺卧时间往往更多。这些差异的幅度很小,小于每日变化,且不是特定于烙印的。总之,烙印伤口至少需要8周才能愈合。这些伤口至少在这么长的时间内仍然疼痛,单次注射NSAID在减轻与打烙印相关的疼痛方面没有可测量的效果,即使在操作后的 immediately 几天也是如此。