医学教育研究的生产力：对原产国的考察。
Productivity in medical education research: an examination of countries of origin.
作者信息
Doja Asif, Horsley Tanya, Sampson Margaret
出版信息
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Nov 18;14:243. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0243-8.
BACKGROUND
Productivity and countries of origin of publications within the field of medical education research have not been explored. Using bibliometric techniques we conducted an analysis of studies evaluating medical education interventions, examining the country where research originated as well as networks of authors within countries identified as 'most productive'.
METHODS
PubMed was used to search for evaluative studies of medical education. We then examined relative productivity of countries with >100 publications in our sample (number of publications/number of medical schools in country). Author networks from the top 2 countries with the highest relative productivity were constructed.
RESULTS
6874 publications from 18,883 different authors were included. The countries with the highest relative publication productivity were Canada (37.1), Netherlands (28.3), New Zealand (27), the UK (23), and the U.S.A (17.1). Author collaboration networks differed in both numbers of authors and intensity of collaborations in the countries with highest relative productivity.
CONCLUSIONS
In terms of the number of publications of evaluative studies in medical education, Canada.
背景
医学教育研究领域的生产力及出版物的原产国尚未得到探究。我们运用文献计量学技术对评估医学教育干预措施的研究进行了分析，考察了研究的起源国以及被确定为“生产力最高”的国家内部的作者网络。
方法
利用PubMed搜索医学教育评估研究。然后我们考察了样本中出版物数量超过100篇的国家的相对生产力（出版物数量/该国医学院数量）。构建了相对生产力最高的两个国家的作者网络。
结果
纳入了来自18883位不同作者的6874篇出版物。相对出版物生产力最高的国家是加拿大（37.1）、荷兰（28.3）、新西兰（27）、英国（23）和美国（17.1）。相对生产力最高的国家在作者数量和合作强度方面的作者合作网络有所不同。
结论
就医学教育评估研究的出版物数量而言，加拿大……（原文此处不完整）
Zotero 插件