• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童虐待性头部创伤临床预测规则的验证

Validation of a clinical prediction rule for pediatric abusive head trauma.

作者信息

Hymel Kent P, Armijo-Garcia Veronica, Foster Robin, Frazier Terra N, Stoiko Michael, Christie LeeAnn M, Harper Nancy S, Weeks Kerri, Carroll Christopher L, Hyden Phil, Sirotnak Andrew, Truemper Edward, Ornstein Amy E, Wang Ming

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire; Departments of Pediatrics, and

Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas;

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2014 Dec;134(6):e1537-44. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1329. Epub 2014 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2014-1329
PMID:25404722
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To reduce missed cases of pediatric abusive head trauma (AHT), Pediatric Brain Injury Research Network investigators derived a 4-variable AHT clinical prediction rule (CPR) with sensitivity of .96. Our objective was to validate the screening performance of this AHT CPR in a new, equivalent patient population.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study. Applying the same inclusion criteria, definitional criteria for AHT, and methods used in the completed derivation study, Pediatric Brain Injury Research Network investigators captured complete clinical, historical, and radiologic data on 291 acutely head-injured children <3 years of age admitted to PICUs at 14 participating sites, sorted them into comparison groups of abusive and nonabusive head trauma, and measured the screening performance of the AHT CPR.

RESULTS

In this new patient population, the 4-variable AHT CPR demonstrated sensitivity of .96, specificity of .46, positive predictive value of .55, negative predictive value of .93, positive likelihood ratio of 1.67, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.09. Secondary analysis revealed that the AHT CPR identified 98% of study patients who were ultimately diagnosed with AHT.

CONCLUSIONS

Four readily available variables (acute respiratory compromise before admission; bruising of the torso, ears, or neck; bilateral or interhemispheric subdural hemorrhages or collections; and any skull fractures other than an isolated, unilateral, nondiastatic, linear, parietal fracture) identify AHT with high sensitivity in young, acutely head-injured children admitted to the PICU.

摘要

背景与目的

为减少儿童虐待性头部创伤(AHT)的漏诊病例,儿童脑损伤研究网络的研究人员制定了一个包含4个变量的AHT临床预测规则(CPR),其灵敏度为0.96。我们的目的是在一个新的、等效的患者群体中验证该AHT CPR的筛查性能。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性横断面研究。应用与已完成的推导研究相同的纳入标准、AHT的定义标准和方法,儿童脑损伤研究网络的研究人员收集了14个参与地点入住儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的291名3岁以下急性头部受伤儿童的完整临床、病史和放射学数据,将他们分为虐待性和非虐待性头部创伤的比较组,并测量AHT CPR的筛查性能。

结果

在这个新的患者群体中,4变量AHT CPR的灵敏度为0.96,特异度为0.46,阳性预测值为0.55,阴性预测值为0.93,阳性似然比为1.67,阴性似然比为0.09。二次分析显示,AHT CPR识别出了最终被诊断为AHT的98%的研究患者。

结论

四个易于获得的变量(入院前急性呼吸功能不全;躯干、耳部或颈部瘀伤;双侧或半球间硬膜下出血或积液;以及除孤立的、单侧的、非分离的、线性的顶骨骨折以外的任何颅骨骨折)在入住PICU的年轻急性头部受伤儿童中能以高灵敏度识别AHT。

相似文献

1
Validation of a clinical prediction rule for pediatric abusive head trauma.儿童虐待性头部创伤临床预测规则的验证
Pediatrics. 2014 Dec;134(6):e1537-44. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1329. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
2
Derivation of a clinical prediction rule for pediatric abusive head trauma.儿童虐待性头部创伤临床预测规则的推导。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;14(2):210-20. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182712b09.
3
Potential Impact of a Validated Screening Tool for Pediatric Abusive Head Trauma.一种经过验证的小儿虐待性头部创伤筛查工具的潜在影响。
J Pediatr. 2015 Dec;167(6):1375-81.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.09.018. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
4
External Validation of the PediBIRN Clinical Prediction Rule for Abusive Head Trauma.儿童虐待性头颅创伤 PediBIRN 临床预测规则的外部验证。
Pediatrics. 2018 May;141(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3674.
5
Validation of the PediBIRN-7 clinical prediction rule for pediatric abusive head trauma.验证 PediBIRN-7 临床预测规则在儿科虐待性头部创伤中的应用。
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Jun;152:106799. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106799. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
6
Screening for pediatric abusive head trauma: Are three variables enough?儿童虐待性头部创伤筛查:三个变量足够吗?
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Mar;125:105518. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105518. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
7
Head injury and unclear mechanism of injury: initial hematocrit less than 30 is predictive of abusive head trauma in young children.头部损伤及损伤机制不明:幼儿初始血细胞比容低于30可预测虐待性头部创伤。
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Feb;49(2):338-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
8
Clinical and radiographic characteristics associated with abusive and nonabusive head trauma: a systematic review.与虐待性和非虐待性头部创伤相关的临床和影像学特征:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2012 Aug;130(2):315-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1545. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
9
Validation of the PredAHT-2 prediction tool for abusive head trauma.预测虐待性头部创伤的 PredAHT-2 预测工具的验证。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Mar;37(3):119-126. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208893. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
10
An analysis of physicians' diagnostic reasoning regarding pediatric abusive head trauma.对儿科虐待性头部创伤相关的医生诊断推理的分析。
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Jul;129:105666. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105666. Epub 2022 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Presenting Characteristics: Abusive Versus Accidental Trauma.重度小儿创伤性脑损伤的呈现特征:虐待性创伤与意外创伤
J Neurotrauma. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1177/08977151251366322.
2
Response to "Missing Factors that may Elucidate Posttraumatic Seizures in Children".对《可能阐明儿童创伤后癫痫发作的缺失因素》的回应
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Feb;42(1):306-307. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02156-2. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
3
Nonfatal Emergency Department Visits Associated with Fall-Related Fractured Skulls of Infants Aged 0-4 Months.
0-4 个月婴儿因跌倒导致颅骨骨折的非致命性急诊科就诊。
J Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;67(2):e138-e145. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.03.015. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
4
Validation of the PediBIRN-7 clinical prediction rule for pediatric abusive head trauma.验证 PediBIRN-7 临床预测规则在儿科虐待性头部创伤中的应用。
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Jun;152:106799. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106799. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
5
A scoping review of research on potential impact of implicit bias in healthcare settings for children with acquired brain injuries.在医疗环境中,对潜在偏见对获得性脑损伤儿童的影响的研究进行范围综述。
Rehabil Psychol. 2024 Feb;69(1):36-44. doi: 10.1037/rep0000519. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
6
Skeletal survey yields in low vs. high risk pediatric patients with skull fractures.颅骨骨折的低危与高危儿科患者的骨骼扫描结果。
Child Abuse Negl. 2023 May;139:106130. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106130. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
7
The CAPNET multi-center data set for child physical abuse: Rationale, methods and scope.儿童身体虐待的 CAPNET 多中心数据集:原理、方法和范围。
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Sep;131:105653. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105653. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
8
An analysis of physicians' diagnostic reasoning regarding pediatric abusive head trauma.对儿科虐待性头部创伤相关的医生诊断推理的分析。
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Jul;129:105666. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105666. Epub 2022 May 11.
9
Diagnosis of Abusive Head Trauma : Neurosurgical Perspective.虐待性头部创伤的诊断:神经外科视角
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2022 May;65(3):370-379. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2021.0284. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
10
Screening for pediatric abusive head trauma: Are three variables enough?儿童虐待性头部创伤筛查:三个变量足够吗?
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Mar;125:105518. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105518. Epub 2022 Jan 22.