Tsivgoulis Georgios, Katsanos Aristeidis H, Alexandrov Andrei V
Department of Neurology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center , Memphis, TN , USA ; Second Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital , Athens , Greece ; International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital , Brno , Czech Republic.
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Ioannina , Ioannina , Greece.
Front Neurol. 2014 Nov 3;5:215. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00215. eCollection 2014.
Over the past 20 years, clinical research has focused on the development of reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), which include the use of systemic intravenous thrombolytics (alteplase, desmoteplase, or tenecteplase), the augmentation of systemic intravenous recanalization with ultrasound, the bridging of intravenous with intra-arterial thrombolysis, the use of multi-modal approaches to reperfusion including thrombectomy and thromboaspiration with different available retrievers. Clinical trials testing these acute reperfusion therapies provided novel insight regarding the comparative safety and efficacy, but also raised new questions and further uncertainty on the field. Intravenous alteplase (tPA) remains the fastest and easiest way to initiate acute stroke reperfusion treatment, and should continue to be the first-line treatment for patients with AIS within 4.5 h from onset. The use of tenecteplase instead of tPA and the augmentation of systemic thrombolysis with ultrasound are both novel therapeutical modalities that may emerge as significant options in AIS treatment. Endovascular treatments for AIS are rapidly evolving due to technological advances in catheter-based interventions and are currently emphasizing speed in order to result in timely restoration of perfusion of still-salvageable, infarcted brain tissue, since delayed recanalization of proximal intracranial occlusions has not been associated with improved clinical outcomes. Comprehensive imaging protocols in AIS may enable better patient selection for endovascular interventions and for testing multi-modal combinatory strategies.
在过去20年里,临床研究主要聚焦于急性缺血性卒中(AIS)再灌注治疗的发展,其中包括使用全身性静脉溶栓药物(阿替普酶、去氨普酶或替奈普酶)、通过超声增强全身性静脉再通、静脉溶栓与动脉内溶栓的桥接、使用包括血栓切除术和用不同可用取栓器进行血栓抽吸的多模式再灌注方法。对这些急性再灌注治疗进行测试的临床试验提供了关于比较安全性和疗效的新见解,但也在该领域提出了新问题并带来了更多不确定性。静脉注射阿替普酶(tPA)仍然是启动急性卒中再灌注治疗最快且最简单的方法,并且应继续作为发病4.5小时内AIS患者的一线治疗方法。使用替奈普酶替代tPA以及用超声增强全身性溶栓都是可能成为AIS治疗重要选择的新型治疗方式。由于基于导管介入技术的进步,AIS的血管内治疗正在迅速发展,目前强调速度,以便及时恢复仍可挽救的梗死脑组织的灌注,因为颅内近端闭塞的延迟再通与改善的临床结果无关。AIS中的综合成像方案可能有助于更好地选择适合血管内介入治疗的患者以及测试多模式联合策略。