Potla Neha, Ganti Latha
Unionville-Chadds Ford School District, Kennett Square, PA, USA.
Departments of Neurology and Emergency Medicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL, USA.
Int J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 4;15(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12245-021-00399-w.
Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with alteplase is the currently approved therapy for patients who present within 4.5 h of symptom onset and meet criteria. Recently, there has been interest in the thrombolytic tenecteplase, a modified version of alteplase, due to its lower cost, ease of administration, and studies reporting better outcomes when compared to alteplase. This systematic review compares the efficacy of tenecteplase vs. alteplase with regard to three outcomes: (1) rate of symptomatic hemorrhage, (2) functional outcome at 90 days, and (3) reperfusion grade after thrombectomy to compare the efficacy of both thrombolytics in AIS METHODS: The search was conducted in August 2021 in PubMed, filtered for randomized controlled trials, and studies in English. The main search term was "tenecteplase for acute stroke."
A total of 6 randomized clinical trials including 1675 patients with AIS was included. No one's study compared alteplase to tenecteplase with all three outcomes after acute ischemic stroke; however, by using a combination of the results, this systematic review summarizes whether tenecteplase outperforms alteplase.
The available evidence suggests that tenecteplase appears to be a better thrombolytic agent for acute ischemic stroke when compared to alteplase.
对于症状发作4.5小时内且符合标准的急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者,使用阿替普酶进行溶栓是目前已获批的治疗方法。最近,由于替奈普酶成本较低、易于给药,且有研究报告称与阿替普酶相比其疗效更好,因此人们对这种阿替普酶的改良版溶栓剂产生了兴趣。本系统评价比较了替奈普酶与阿替普酶在三个结局方面的疗效:(1)症状性出血发生率,(2)90天时的功能结局,以及(3)血栓切除术术后的再灌注等级,以比较两种溶栓剂在急性缺血性卒中中的疗效。方法:于2021年8月在PubMed中进行检索,筛选随机对照试验及英文研究。主要检索词为“替奈普酶用于急性卒中”。
共纳入6项随机临床试验,涉及1675例急性缺血性卒中患者。没有一项研究在急性缺血性卒中后比较阿替普酶与替奈普酶的所有三个结局;然而,通过综合各项结果,本系统评价总结了替奈普酶是否优于阿替普酶。
现有证据表明,与阿替普酶相比,替奈普酶似乎是治疗急性缺血性卒中的更好溶栓剂。