Misanin J R, Hinderliter C F
Psychol Rep. 1989 Apr;64(2):611-4. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1989.64.2.611.
Theory and research suggest that long delay taste-aversion conditioning should be less affected by proximal US preexposure than short-delay conditioning. The present research tested this hypothesis by administering illness-inducing LiCl shortly before a saccharin-LiCl pairing in which the postsaccharin LiCl was administered either immediately or 20 min. after access to saccharin. The results suggest that US preexposure has a more deleterious effect on conditioning when the illness-inducing US is delayed in conditioning than when it is immediate. These results are to be expected on the basis of classical conditioning principles and question theory and research that suggest more deleterious effects of US preexposure with shorter intervals between the preexposed and conditioning US.
理论和研究表明,与短延迟条件作用相比,长延迟味觉厌恶条件作用受近端非条件刺激(US)预暴露的影响应较小。本研究通过在糖精 - 氯化锂配对之前不久给予诱发疾病的氯化锂来检验这一假设,其中在接触糖精后,氯化锂要么立即给予,要么在20分钟后给予。结果表明,在条件作用中,当诱发疾病的非条件刺激延迟时,非条件刺激预暴露对条件作用的有害影响比其立即出现时更大。基于经典条件作用原理以及认为非条件刺激预暴露在预暴露的非条件刺激与条件作用的非条件刺激之间间隔较短时具有更大有害影响的问题理论和研究,这些结果是可以预期的。