Infection, Injury and Inflammation Research Group, Biomedical Facility, Clinical Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, Greater Manchester, M6 8HD, UK.
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jan;41(1):86-93. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3551-x. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
SeptiFast is a real-time PCR assay which targets ribosomal DNA sequences of bacteria and fungi, enabling detection and identification of the commonest pathogens in blood within a few hours, including those acquired in healthcare settings. We report here the first detailed assessment of SeptiFast that focuses on healthcare-associated bloodstream infections which develop during routine critical care.
This was a prospective multicentre study designed to compare the clinical diagnostic accuracy of SeptiFast versus microbiological culture and independent clinical adjudication. This Phase III diagnostic study was performed in an adequately sized cohort of adult patients who developed new signs of suspected bloodstream infection while receiving routine critical care.
Of 1,006 new episodes of suspected bloodstream infection in 853 patients, 922 (92 %) of these episodes in 795 patients met the inclusion criteria of the study. Patients had been exposed to a median of 8 days (interquartile range 4-16) of hospital care and had received high levels of organ support and recent antibiotic exposure. The SeptiFast test, when compared with bloodstream infection at the species/genus level, had a greater specificity [0.86, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.83-0.88] than sensitivity (0.50, 95 % CI 0.39-0.61). There was a low prevalence of blood culture-proven pathogens (9.2 %, 95 % CI 7.4-11.2 %), and the post-test probabilities of both a positive (26.3 %, 95 % CI 19.8-33.7 %) and a negative SeptiFast test (5.6 %, 95 % CI 4.1-7.4 %) indicated potential limitations of this technology in diagnosing bloodstream infection.
When compared with blood culture, SeptiFast is likely to have limited utility for the diagnosis of healthcare-associated bloodstream infection in critical care patients despite its potential to deliver results more rapidly.
SeptiFast 是一种实时 PCR 检测方法,针对细菌和真菌的核糖体 DNA 序列,能够在数小时内检测和鉴定血液中最常见的病原体,包括在医疗机构中获得的病原体。我们在此报告对 SeptiFast 的首次详细评估,重点关注在常规重症监护中发生的与医疗保健相关的血流感染。
这是一项前瞻性多中心研究,旨在比较 SeptiFast 与微生物培养和独立临床判断的临床诊断准确性。这项 III 期诊断研究在一个足够大的成年患者队列中进行,这些患者在接受常规重症监护时出现新的疑似血流感染迹象。
在 853 名患者的 1006 例新疑似血流感染中,795 例患者中有 922 例(92%)符合研究纳入标准。患者接受了中位数为 8 天(四分位间距 4-16)的医院治疗,接受了高水平的器官支持和近期抗生素暴露。与物种/属水平的血流感染相比,SeptiFast 检测具有更高的特异性[0.86,95%置信区间(CI)0.83-0.88],而非敏感性(0.50,95%CI 0.39-0.61)。血液培养阳性病原体的患病率较低(9.2%,95%CI 7.4-11.2%),阳性(26.3%,95%CI 19.8-33.7%)和阴性 SeptiFast 检测(5.6%,95%CI 4.1-7.4%)的后验概率均表明该技术在诊断血流感染方面存在潜在局限性。
与血液培养相比,尽管 SeptiFast 有可能更快地提供结果,但在重症监护患者中,它对诊断与医疗保健相关的血流感染的应用可能有限。