• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过最佳护理模式了解低收入家庭如何为其子女确定医疗保健可及性要素的优先次序。

Understanding how low-income families prioritize elements of health care access for their children via the optimal care model.

作者信息

Angier Heather, Gregg Jessica, Gold Rachel, Crawford Courtney, Davis Melinda, DeVoe Jennifer E

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 19;14:585. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0585-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-014-0585-2
PMID:25406509
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4240836/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Insurance coverage alone does not guarantee access to needed health care. Few studies have explored what "access" means to low-income families, nor have they examined how elements of access are prioritized when availability, affordability, and acceptability are not all achievable. Therefore, we explored low-income parents' perspectives on accessing health care.

METHODS

In-depth interviews with a purposeful sample of 29 Oregon parents who responded to a previously administered statewide survey about health insurance. Transcribed interviews were analyzed by a multidisciplinary team using a standard iterative process.

RESULTS

Parents highlighted affordability and limited availability as barriers to care; a continuous relationship with a health care provider helped them overcome these barriers. Parents also described the difficult decisions they made between affordability and acceptability in order to get the best care they could for their children. We present a new conceptual model to explain these experiences accessing care with health insurance: the Optimal Care Model. The model shows a transition from optimal care to a breaking point where affordability becomes the driving factor, but the care is perceived as unacceptable because it is with an unknown provider.

CONCLUSIONS

Even when covered by health insurance, low-income parents face barriers to accessing health care for their children. As the Affordable Care Act and other policies increase coverage options across the United States, many Americans may experience similar barriers and facilitators to health care access. The Optimal Care Model provides a useful construct for better understanding experiences that may be encountered when the newly insured attempt to access available, acceptable, and affordable health care services.

摘要

背景

仅靠保险覆盖并不能保证获得所需的医疗保健服务。很少有研究探讨“获得医疗服务”对低收入家庭意味着什么,也没有研究在可及性、可负担性和可接受性无法全部实现时,如何对获得医疗服务的各个要素进行优先排序。因此,我们探讨了低收入父母对获得医疗保健服务的看法。

方法

对29位俄勒冈州父母进行了有目的的深入访谈,这些父母回应了之前在全州范围内进行的一项关于医疗保险的调查。多学科团队使用标准的迭代过程对访谈记录进行了分析。

结果

父母强调可负担性和有限的可及性是获得医疗服务的障碍;与医疗服务提供者建立持续的关系有助于他们克服这些障碍。父母还描述了他们在可负担性和可接受性之间做出的艰难决定,以便为孩子获得尽可能好的医疗服务。我们提出了一个新的概念模型来解释这些通过医疗保险获得医疗服务的经历:最佳医疗模型。该模型显示了从最佳医疗到一个临界点的转变,在这个临界点上,可负担性成为驱动因素,但由于医疗服务是由一个不熟悉的提供者提供的,所以被认为是不可接受的。

结论

即使有医疗保险覆盖,低收入父母在为孩子获得医疗保健服务方面仍面临障碍。随着《平价医疗法案》和其他政策增加了美国各地的保险覆盖选择,许多美国人在获得医疗服务时可能会遇到类似的障碍和促进因素。最佳医疗模型为更好地理解新参保者在试图获得可用、可接受和可负担的医疗服务时可能遇到的经历提供了一个有用的框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f8/4240836/e2436b238628/12913_2014_585_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f8/4240836/e2436b238628/12913_2014_585_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f8/4240836/e2436b238628/12913_2014_585_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding how low-income families prioritize elements of health care access for their children via the optimal care model.通过最佳护理模式了解低收入家庭如何为其子女确定医疗保健可及性要素的优先次序。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 19;14:585. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0585-2.
2
Insurance + access not equal to health care: typology of barriers to health care access for low-income families.保险+就医机会不等于医疗保健:低收入家庭获得医疗保健的障碍类型
Ann Fam Med. 2007 Nov-Dec;5(6):511-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.748.
3
A Qualitative Exploration of Low-Income Women's Experiences Accessing Abortion in Massachusetts.对马萨诸塞州低收入女性获取堕胎服务经历的定性探索。
Womens Health Issues. 2015 Sep-Oct;25(5):463-9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Jun 13.
4
Children of working low-income families in California: does parental work benefit children's insurance status, access, and utilization of primary health care?加利福尼亚州低收入在职家庭的儿童:父母工作对儿童的保险状况、初级卫生保健的可及性和利用情况有好处吗?
Health Serv Res. 2000 Jun;35(2):417-41.
5
Health care for children and youth in the United States: annual report on patterns of coverage, utilization, quality, and expenditures by income.美国儿童和青少年的医疗保健:按收入划分的覆盖范围、利用情况、质量和支出模式年度报告。
Ambul Pediatr. 2005 Jan-Feb;5(1):6-44. doi: 10.1367/A04-119R.1.
6
Medicaid Expansion Increased Coverage, Improved Affordability, And Reduced Psychological Distress For Low-Income Parents.医疗补助计划扩大覆盖范围,提高了可负担性,减少了低收入父母的心理困扰。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 May 1;36(5):808-818. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1650.
7
Uninsurance among children whose parents are losing Medicaid coverage: Results from a statewide survey of Oregon families.父母正在失去医疗补助覆盖的儿童中的未参保情况:俄勒冈州家庭全州范围调查结果
Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb;43(1 Pt 2):401-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00764.x.
8
Do access experiences affect parents' decisions to enroll their children in Medicaid and SCHIP? Findings from focus groups with parents.获得医疗服务的经历会影响父母为孩子注册医疗补助计划(Medicaid)和儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)的决定吗?与父母进行焦点小组讨论的结果。
Matern Child Health J. 2006 Nov;10(6):517-25. doi: 10.1007/s10995-006-0145-4.
9
Access and Quality of Care by Insurance Type for Low-Income Adults Before the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施前低收入成年人按保险类型划分的医疗服务可及性与质量
Am J Public Health. 2016 Aug;106(8):1409-15. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303156. Epub 2016 May 19.
10
Characteristics of Young Adults Enrolled Through the Affordable Care Act-Dependent Coverage Expansion.通过《平价医疗法案》相关医保覆盖范围扩大计划参保的青年成年人的特征。
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Dec;59(6):648-653. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.07.027. Epub 2016 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting Adherence to a Yoga Intervention for Veterans With Chronic Low Back Pain.促进慢性腰痛退伍军人对瑜伽干预的依从性。
Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2025 Feb 21;14:27536130251323247. doi: 10.1177/27536130251323247. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Medicaid Dental Benefits for Pregnant People and Dental Care Use Among Very Young Children. Medicaid 为孕妇提供的牙科福利与非常年幼儿童的牙科保健利用。
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Sep;28(9):1604-1611. doi: 10.1007/s10995-024-03955-x. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
3
A Qualitative Study of Two Oregon Family Medicine Clinics to Explain Parent and Child Healthcare Initiation and Engagement.

本文引用的文献

1
The affordable care act: the value of systemic disruption.平价医疗法案:系统性颠覆的价值。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jun;103(6):969-72. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301180. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
2
Academic medical centers and equity in specialty care access for children.学术医疗中心与儿童专科护理可及性的公平性
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Apr;166(4):304-10. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.1158. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
3
Nonfinancial barriers and access to care for U.S. adults.美国成年人的非财务障碍与医疗保健可及性。
一项关于俄勒冈州两家家庭医学诊所的定性研究,以解释家长和儿童的医疗保健启动及参与情况。
J Patient Exp. 2022 Nov 4;9:23743735221133654. doi: 10.1177/23743735221133654. eCollection 2022.
4
Waitlist management in a pediatric weight management clinic: implementing an orientation session.儿科体重管理诊所的候补名单管理:实施一个介绍会议。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Sep 22;21(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02868-w.
5
Rates of Undiagnosed Hypertension and Diagnosed Hypertension Without Anti-hypertensive Medication Following the Affordable Care Act.平价医疗法案实施后未诊断高血压和未接受抗高血压药物治疗的高血压发病率。
Am J Hypertens. 2021 Sep 22;34(9):989-998. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpab069.
6
How Cancer Supportive and Palliative Care is Developed: Comparing the Policy-Making Process in Three Countries from Three Continents.癌症支持性与姑息治疗是如何发展的:比较来自三大洲三个国家的政策制定过程。
Indian J Palliat Care. 2020 Jan-Mar;26(1):72-79. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_55_19. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
7
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Provider-Related Barriers to Health Care for Children in California After the ACA.《平价医疗法案》实施后加利福尼亚州儿童在医疗服务提供者相关医疗保健障碍方面的种族和族裔差异
Glob Pediatr Health. 2019 Feb 10;6:2333794X19828356. doi: 10.1177/2333794X19828356. eCollection 2019.
8
Conceptualising paediatric health disparities: a metanarrative systematic review and unified conceptual framework.概念化儿科健康差距:元叙述系统评价和统一概念框架。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 4;7(8):e015456. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015456.
Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb;47(1 Pt 2):462-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01308.x. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
4
Health insurance status, medical debt, and their impact on access to care in Arizona.亚利桑那州的医疗保险状况、医疗债务及其对获得医疗服务的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Aug;101(8):1437-43. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300080. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
5
Auditing access to specialty care for children with public insurance.审核公共保险儿童获得专科护理的情况。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 16;364(24):2324-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1013285.
6
Defining and targeting health care access barriers.定义并针对医疗保健获取障碍
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011 May;22(2):562-75. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0037.
7
The case for synergy between a usual source of care and health insurance coverage.倡导常规医疗服务与健康保险之间的协同作用。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Sep;26(9):1059-66. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1666-0. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
8
Is health insurance enough? A usual source of care may be more important to ensure a child receives preventive health counseling.仅仅有健康保险足够吗?一个常规的医疗服务提供方也许对于确保孩子得到预防保健咨询更为重要。
Matern Child Health J. 2012 Feb;16(2):306-15. doi: 10.1007/s10995-011-0762-4.
9
Comparing child health, access to care, and utilization of health services between Ohio Appalachia's River and non-river bordering counties.比较俄亥俄阿巴拉契亚地区河流和非河流边界县的儿童健康、获得医疗保健的机会以及卫生服务的利用情况。
J Community Health. 2011 Oct;36(5):819-30. doi: 10.1007/s10900-011-9380-8.
10
Creating an effective and efficient publicly sponsored health care delivery system.创建一个高效且有效的公共资助医疗服务提供体系。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011 Feb;22(1):311-9. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0007.