• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于俄勒冈州两家家庭医学诊所的定性研究,以解释家长和儿童的医疗保健启动及参与情况。

A Qualitative Study of Two Oregon Family Medicine Clinics to Explain Parent and Child Healthcare Initiation and Engagement.

作者信息

Angier Heather, Wyte-Lake Tamar, Williams Shannon, McCrimmon Sara, Moreno Laura, E DeVoe Jennifer, Cohen Deborah

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2022 Nov 4;9:23743735221133654. doi: 10.1177/23743735221133654. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1177/23743735221133654
PMID:36353569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9638683/
Abstract

Parental factors are associated with children's receipt of recommended care but not adequately described. We conducted a qualitative study of patients with at least two visits who were a primary caregiver for a child who also had at least two visits at the same clinic in 1/2018-12/2019 from two Oregon family medicine clinics. We stratified patients by child age and number of caregiver visits and randomly selected caregivers. Participants were interviewed in accordance with approval by our Institutional Review Board between 12/2020 and 4/2021. The data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. 12 caregivers (termed parents) were interviewed; half were single parents and three-quarters had a history of substance use disorder and/or a mental health condition. Parents focused on the importance of keeping themselves healthy to keep their families healthy. They described similar reasons for choosing to initiate and continue care for themselves and their children at the same clinic, including: convenience, trust, relationships, and receiving whole-person and whole-family care. Many valued having a healthcare "home" for their entire family. We developed a figure that highlights three themes that capture the interrelated factors parents identified as supporting healthcare use for themselves and their families. These overarching themes included: healthcare initiation; healthcare engagement and continuity; and parent bringing child to the same clinic for healthcare. Our data suggests that long-standing patient-clinic relationships for parents and children can support family-focused healthcare.

摘要

父母因素与儿童接受推荐护理相关,但对此描述并不充分。我们对2018年1月至2019年12月期间来自俄勒冈州两家家庭医学诊所、至少就诊过两次的患者进行了一项定性研究,这些患者是在同一家诊所至少就诊过两次的儿童的主要照顾者。我们根据儿童年龄和照顾者就诊次数对患者进行分层,并随机选择照顾者。在2020年12月至2021年4月期间,参与者在获得我们机构审查委员会批准后接受了访谈。数据采用扎根理论方法进行分析。采访了12名照顾者(称为父母);其中一半是单亲,四分之三有物质使用障碍和/或心理健康问题史。父母们强调保持自身健康对维持家庭健康的重要性。他们描述了在同一家诊所为自己和孩子开始并持续接受护理的相似原因,包括:便利、信任、人际关系,以及接受全人、全家护理。许多人重视为整个家庭拥有一个医疗“家”。我们绘制了一个图表,突出了三个主题,这些主题涵盖了父母们认为支持自己和家人使用医疗服务的相互关联因素。这些总体主题包括:医疗服务的开始;医疗服务的参与和连续性;以及父母带孩子到同一家诊所接受医疗服务。我们的数据表明,父母与孩子长期的医患关系可以支持以家庭为中心的医疗保健。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6887/9638683/c207fad6c400/10.1177_23743735221133654-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6887/9638683/c207fad6c400/10.1177_23743735221133654-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6887/9638683/c207fad6c400/10.1177_23743735221133654-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
A Qualitative Study of Two Oregon Family Medicine Clinics to Explain Parent and Child Healthcare Initiation and Engagement.一项关于俄勒冈州两家家庭医学诊所的定性研究,以解释家长和儿童的医疗保健启动及参与情况。
J Patient Exp. 2022 Nov 4;9:23743735221133654. doi: 10.1177/23743735221133654. eCollection 2022.
2
Effectiveness and experiences of families and support workers participating in peer-led parenting support programs delivered as home visiting programs: a comprehensive systematic review.家庭和支持工作者参与以同伴为主导的育儿支持项目(作为家访项目开展)的有效性和经验:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Oct;14(10):167-208. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003166.
3
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
4
An intervention for parents with severe personality difficulties whose children have mental health problems: a feasibility RCT.一项针对有严重人格障碍且其子女有心理健康问题的父母的干预措施:一项可行性 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(14):1-188. doi: 10.3310/hta24140.
5
The health and well-being of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy.脑瘫患儿照料者的健康与幸福。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):e626-36. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1689.
6
Awareness of parental illness: a grounded theory of upholding family equilibrium in parents on long-term sick-leave in primary health care.对父母患病的认知:关于在初级卫生保健中维持长期休病假父母家庭平衡的扎根理论
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021 Sep;39(3):268-278. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2021.1928835. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
7
Daily living with distress and enrichment: the moral experience of families with ventilator-assisted children at home.带着痛苦与充实生活:家中有使用呼吸机辅助的孩子的家庭的道德体验。
Pediatrics. 2006 Jan;117(1):e48-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0789.
8
A Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study of Integrated Pediatric Complex Care: Experiences of Parents With Care and the Value of Parent Engagement in Research.综合儿科复杂护理的混合方法可行性研究:家长的护理体验及家长参与研究的价值
Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Oct 28;2:710335. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.710335. eCollection 2021.
9
10
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.

本文引用的文献

1
Rural Disparities in Early Childhood Well Child Visit Attendance.农村地区儿童早期健康访视参与的差异。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2021 May-Jun;58:76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.12.005. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
2
Barriers to Attendance of Prenatal and Well-Child Visits.产前和儿童健康访视的参与障碍。
Acad Pediatr. 2021 Aug;21(6):955-960. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2020.11.025. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
3
Caregiver and Clinician Perspectives on Missed Well-Child Visits.照顾者和临床医生对错过儿童常规健康检查的看法。
Ann Fam Med. 2020 Jan;18(1):30-34. doi: 10.1370/afm.2466.
4
Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers.扎根理论研究:新手研究者的设计框架。
SAGE Open Med. 2019 Jan 2;7:2050312118822927. doi: 10.1177/2050312118822927. eCollection 2019.
5
Adolescents' and Young Adults' Routine Care Use: The Role of Their Mothers' Care Use Behaviors.青少年和年轻成年人的常规护理使用:他们母亲的护理使用行为的作用。
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Jan;64(1):107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
6
Gaps in Well-Child Care Attendance Among Primary Care Clinics Serving Low-Income Families.服务低收入家庭的基层医疗诊所中儿童常规保健就诊的差距。
Pediatrics. 2018 Nov;142(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-4019. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
7
Association Between Parental Barriers to Accessing a Usual Source of Care and Children's Receipt of Preventive Services.父母获取常规医疗服务来源的障碍与儿童预防性服务接受情况之间的关联
Public Health Rep. 2017 May/Jun;132(3):316-325. doi: 10.1177/0033354917699831. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
8
Toxic Stress in Children and Adolescents.儿童和青少年的毒性应激
Adv Pediatr. 2016 Aug;63(1):403-28. doi: 10.1016/j.yapd.2016.04.002.
9
Toxic Stress: Effects, Prevention and Treatment.毒性应激:影响、预防与治疗
Children (Basel). 2014 Nov 3;1(3):390-402. doi: 10.3390/children1030390.
10
2015 Recommendations for Preventive Pediatric Health Care Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine and Bright Futures Periodicity Schedule Workgroup.2015年预防性儿童保健建议 实践与门诊医学委员会及光明未来定期检查表工作组
Pediatrics. 2015 Sep;136(3):e727. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2009. Epub 2015 Aug 31.