Crit Care. 2011;15(6):1005. doi: 10.1186/cc10491. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
Real-time monitoring of mixed venous oxygen blood saturation (SvO2) or of central venous oxygen blood saturation is often used during resuscitation of septic shock. However, the meaning of these parameters is far from straightforward. In the present commentary, we emphasize that SvO2--a global marker of tissue oxygen balance--can never be simplistically used as a marker of preload responsiveness, which is an intrinsic marker of cardiac performance. In some septic shock patients, because of profound hypovolemia or myocardial dysfunction, SvO2 can be low but obviously cannot alone indicate whether a fluid challenge would increase cardiac output. In other patients, because of a profound impairment of oxygen extraction capacities, SvO2 can be abnormally high even in patients who are still able to respond positively to fluid infusion. In any case, other reliable dynamic parameters can help to address the important question of fluid responsiveness/unresponsiveness. However, whether fluid administration in fluid responders and high SvO2 would be efficacious to reduce tissue dysoxia in the most injured tissues is still uncertain.
在脓毒性休克复苏过程中,常进行混合静脉血氧饱和度(SvO2)或中心静脉血氧饱和度的实时监测。然而,这些参数的意义远非如此简单。在本述评中,我们强调 SvO2--组织氧平衡的整体标志物--绝不能简单地用作前负荷反应性的标志物,而前负荷反应性是心脏功能的固有标志物。在一些脓毒性休克患者中,由于严重的血容量不足或心肌功能障碍,SvO2 可能较低,但显然不能单独表明液体冲击是否会增加心输出量。在其他患者中,由于氧摄取能力严重受损,即使对液体输注仍能产生积极反应的患者,SvO2 也可能异常升高。在任何情况下,其他可靠的动态参数都有助于解决关于液体反应性/无反应性的重要问题。然而,在液体反应者中给予液体以及高 SvO2 是否能有效减轻最受损组织的组织缺氧仍不确定。