Suppr超能文献

美国2型糖尿病患者胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂治疗依从性的回顾性研究

Retrospective study of adherence to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United States.

作者信息

Johnston Stephen S, Nguyen Hiep, Felber Eugene, Cappell Katherine, Nelson James K, Chu Bong-Chul, Kalsekar Iftekhar

机构信息

Truven Health Analytics, 7700 Old Georgetown Rd, Suite 650, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA,

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2014 Nov;31(11):1119-33. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0166-0. Epub 2014 Nov 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Greater adherence to medications has been broadly demonstrated to be associated with improved clinical outcomes. However, there is limited real-world evidence on adherence to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used United States administrative claims data to compare adherence to GLP-1RAs in T2DM patients initiating exenatide once weekly (QW), exenatide twice daily (BID), or once-daily liraglutide (initiated therapy = index therapy). Patients were included if they had T2DM, were GLP-1RA-naïve, initiated a GLP-1RA from 02/01/2012-01/31/2013 (date of initiation = index), were ≥18 years at index, and had continuous enrollment for 12 months before (baseline) to 6 months after index (follow-up). Study outcome was index GLP-1RA adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC] during follow-up, dichotomized at ≥80% vs. <80%, and at ≥90% vs. <90%). Multivariable logistic regressions compared adherence between the GLP-1RAs, adjusting for potential confounders. Sensitivity analyses were performed separating liraglutide by dose (1.2 mg/1.8 mg).

RESULTS

Study sample included 4,041 exenatide QW, 4,586 exenatide BID, and 14,211 liraglutide (6,641 1.2 mg, 7,570 1.8 mg) patients. Median unadjusted PDC values were 0.783 for exenatide QW, 0.500 exenatide BID, 0.722 liraglutide, 0.761 liraglutide 1.2 mg, and 0.683 liraglutide 1.8 mg. Compared with patients treated with either exenatide BID or liraglutide, patients treated with exenatide QW had a statistically significantly greater multivariable-adjusted odds of achieving adherence of ≥80% (odds ratio vs. exenatide QW (OR) = 0.41 for exenatide BID; 0.80, liraglutide; 0.87, liraglutide 1.2 mg; 0.75, liraglutide 1.8 mg) and ≥90% (OR = 0.31 for exenatide BID; 0.60 liraglutide; 0.66 liraglutide 1.2 mg; 0.56 liraglutide 1.8 mg) (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients initiating exenatide QW had significantly higher adjusted odds of adherence compared with patients initiating other GLP-1RAs. Given differences in adherence across the GLP-1RAs, research correlating these factors with clinical and economic outcomes is warranted.

摘要

引言

广泛的证据表明,更好地坚持用药与改善临床结局相关。然而,关于2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者使用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)治疗的依从性,现实世界中的证据有限。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究使用美国行政索赔数据,比较起始使用每周一次艾塞那肽(QW)、每日两次艾塞那肽(BID)或每日一次利拉鲁肽(起始治疗=索引治疗)的T2DM患者对GLP-1RA的依从性。纳入标准为患有T2DM、既往未使用过GLP-1RA、在2012年2月1日至2013年1月31日期间起始使用GLP-1RA(起始日期=索引日期)、索引日期时年龄≥18岁,且在索引日期前12个月(基线)至索引日期后6个月(随访)持续入组。研究结局为索引GLP-1RA依从性(随访期间的覆盖天数比例[PDC],分为≥80%与<80%,以及≥90%与<90%)。多变量逻辑回归比较了GLP-1RA之间的依从性,并对潜在混杂因素进行了调整。进行敏感性分析,将利拉鲁肽按剂量(1.2mg/1.8mg)分开。

结果

研究样本包括4041例每周一次艾塞那肽患者、4586例每日两次艾塞那肽患者和14211例利拉鲁肽患者(6641例1.2mg,7570例1.8mg)。未调整的PDC中位数,每周一次艾塞那肽为0.783,每日两次艾塞那肽为0.500,利拉鲁肽为0.722,1.2mg利拉鲁肽为0.761,1.8mg利拉鲁肽为0.683。与接受每日两次艾塞那肽或利拉鲁肽治疗的患者相比,接受每周一次艾塞那肽治疗的患者在多变量调整后实现≥80%依从性的几率显著更高(与每周一次艾塞那肽相比的优势比[OR]:每日两次艾塞那肽为0.41;利拉鲁肽为0.80;1.2mg利拉鲁肽为0.87;1.8mg利拉鲁肽为0.75),以及≥90%依从性的几率(OR:每日两次艾塞那肽为0.31;利拉鲁肽为0.60;1.2mg利拉鲁肽为0.66;1.8mg利拉鲁肽为0.56)(所有P<0.001)。

结论

与起始使用其他GLP-1RA的患者相比,起始使用每周一次艾塞那肽的患者调整后的依从性几率显著更高。鉴于不同GLP-1RA之间的依从性存在差异,有必要开展将这些因素与临床和经济结局相关联的研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验