Hageman Michiel G J S, Briet Jan Paul, Oosterhoff Thijs C H, Bot Arjan G, Ring David, Vranceanu Ana-Maria
Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114 USA ; Behavioral Medicine Service, Clinical Psychologist, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, One Bowdoin Square, 7th floor, Boston, MA 02114 USA.
J Hand Microsurg. 2014 Dec;6(2):59-64. doi: 10.1007/s12593-014-0140-8. Epub 2014 Jun 8.
Cognitive flexibility - the ability to restructure one's knowledge, incorporate new facts, widen perspective, and adapt to the demands of new and unexpected conditions - can help one adapt to illness. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between cognitive flexibility and hand and upper extremity specific disability in patients presenting to a hand surgeon. Secondarily, we determined predictors of cognitive flexibility and pain. Eighty-nine consecutive outpatients completed the Cognitive flexibility questionnaire (CFS), Short Health Anxiety Inventory-5 (SHAI-5), Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand, short form (QuickDASH), and Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression-2 (PHQ-2) in a cross-sectional study. CFS did not correlate with disability or pain intensity. Disability correlated with PSEQ (r = -0.66, p < 0.01), PHQ-2 (r = 0.38, p = <0.01), and SHAI-5 (r = 0.33, p < 0.01). Pain intensity correlated with PSEQ (r = -0.51 p < 0.01) and PHQ-2 (r = 0.41 p < 0.01). There was a small correlation between the CFS and PSEQ (r = 0.25, p = 0.02). The best multivariable models for QuickDASH and pain intensity included PSEQ and PHQ and explained 35 % and 28 % of the variability respectively. Upper extremity specific disability and pain intensity are limited more by self-efficacy than cognitive flexibility. Interventions to improve self-efficacy might help patients with upper extremity illness.
认知灵活性——即重新构建个人知识、纳入新事实、拓宽视野以及适应新的意外情况要求的能力——有助于人们适应疾病。本研究旨在评估认知灵活性与手部外科门诊患者手部及上肢特定残疾之间的关系。其次,我们确定了认知灵活性和疼痛的预测因素。在一项横断面研究中,89名连续门诊患者完成了认知灵活性问卷(CFS)、简短健康焦虑量表-5(SHAI-5)、疼痛自我效能量表(PSEQ)、手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍简表(QuickDASH)以及患者健康问卷抑郁-2(PHQ-2)。CFS与残疾或疼痛强度无相关性。残疾与PSEQ(r = -0.66,p < 0.01)、PHQ-2(r = 0.38,p = <0.01)和SHAI-5(r = 0.33,p < 0.01)相关。疼痛强度与PSEQ(r = -0.51,p < 0.01)和PHQ-2(r = 0.41,p < 0.01)相关。CFS与PSEQ之间存在较小的相关性(r = 0.25,p = 0.02)。QuickDASH和疼痛强度的最佳多变量模型包括PSEQ和PHQ,分别解释了35%和28%的变异性。上肢特定残疾和疼痛强度受自我效能的限制比认知灵活性更大。提高自我效能的干预措施可能有助于上肢疾病患者。