Fabregat Gustavo, Roselló Marta, Asensio-Samper Juan Marcos, Villaneuva-Pérez Vincent Luis, Martínez-Sanjuan Vicente, De Andrés José, Eichenberger Urs
Anesthesiologist, Multidisciplinary Pain Management Department, General University Hospital, Valencia, Spain; General Practitioner, Multidisciplinary Pain Management Department, General University Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Head of Radiology Department, G.
Pain Physician. 2014 Nov-Dec;17(6):507-13.
Approximately 6% to 8% of lumbar pain cases, whether associated with radicular pain or not, may be attributed to the presence of piriformis muscle syndrome. Available treatments, among others, include pharmacotherapy, physical therapy, and injections of different substances into the muscle. Various methods have been used to confirm correct needle placement during these procedures, including electromyography (EMG), fluoroscopy, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Ultrasonography (US) has now become a widely used technique and therefore may be an attractive alternative for needle guidance when injecting this muscle.
The objective of this study was to assess the reliability of US in piriformis injection of patients with piriformis syndrome.
Feasibility study; 10 patients with piriformis muscle syndrome were injected with botulinum toxin A using a US-guided procedure. Then patients were administered 2 mL iodinated contrast and were then transferred to the CT scanner, where they underwent pelvic and hip imaging to assess intramuscular distribution of the iodinated contrast.
Multidisciplinary Pain Management Department in Spain.
Of all 10 study patients (8 women, 2 men), 9 had intramuscular or intrafascial contrast distribution. Distribution did not go deeper than the piriformis muscle in any of the patients. The absence of contrast (intravascular injection) was not observed in any case.
The main limitation of our study is the use of ionizing radiation as confirmation technique.
Ultrasound-guided puncture may be a reliable and simple procedure for injection of the piriformis muscle, as long as good education and training are provided to the operator. US has a number of advantages over traditional approaches, including accessibility and especially no ionizing radiation exposure for both health care providers and patients.
约6%至8%的腰痛病例,无论是否伴有神经根性疼痛,都可能归因于梨状肌综合征。现有的治疗方法包括药物治疗、物理治疗以及向肌肉内注射不同物质。在这些操作过程中,已使用多种方法来确认针头的正确位置,包括肌电图(EMG)、荧光透视、计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振成像(MRI)。超声检查(US)现已成为一种广泛使用的技术,因此在注射该肌肉时,它可能是一种有吸引力的针头引导替代方法。
本研究的目的是评估超声检查在梨状肌综合征患者梨状肌注射中的可靠性。
可行性研究;对10例梨状肌综合征患者采用超声引导程序注射A型肉毒杆菌毒素。然后给患者注射2 mL碘化造影剂,随后将其转移至CT扫描仪,在那里对骨盆和髋部进行成像,以评估碘化造影剂在肌肉内的分布情况。
西班牙多学科疼痛管理科。
在所有10例研究患者(8名女性,2名男性)中,9例造影剂分布在肌肉内或筋膜内。在任何患者中,造影剂分布均未超过梨状肌。在任何情况下均未观察到造影剂缺失(血管内注射)。
我们研究的主要局限性是使用电离辐射作为确认技术。
只要对操作者进行良好的教育和培训,超声引导下穿刺可能是一种可靠且简单的梨状肌注射方法。与传统方法相比,超声检查有许多优点,包括可及性,特别是对医护人员和患者而言均无电离辐射暴露。