Helgesen Marit K
Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research, Norway
Scand J Public Health. 2014 Nov;42(15 Suppl):25-30. doi: 10.1177/1403494814546925.
The two pillars of public health are health promotion and disease prevention. Based on a notion of governance in the state -local relation as changing from hierarchical via New Public Management (NPM) to New Public Governance (NPG), the governance of public health in Norway is contrasted to governance of public health in the other Nordic states: Denmark, Finland and Sweden.
The article aims to present and discuss the governance of public health as it is played out in the state-local relationship.
The method is to study central state documents in the four countries, as well as articles, research reports and papers on public health.
The article shows that the governance modes (hierarchy, NPM and NPG) exist in parallel, but that their mechanisms actually vary in use. Legal, economic and informational mechanisms are, to a varying degree, in use.
In Finnish and Swedish public health policies, health promotion is at the forefront; while Danish and Norwegian public health policies spur the local governments to carry out interventions to prevent disease and hospital admissions.
公共卫生的两大支柱是健康促进和疾病预防。基于国家与地方关系治理从等级制经由新公共管理(NPM)转变为新公共治理(NPG)的理念,挪威公共卫生治理与其他北欧国家(丹麦、芬兰和瑞典)的公共卫生治理形成对比。
本文旨在呈现并讨论公共卫生治理在国家与地方关系中的具体表现。
研究这四个国家的中央政府文件,以及关于公共卫生的文章、研究报告和论文。
本文表明治理模式(等级制、新公共管理和新公共治理)并行存在,但它们的实际运行机制有所不同。法律、经济和信息机制在不同程度上被使用。
在芬兰和瑞典的公共卫生政策中,健康促进处于前沿位置;而丹麦和挪威的公共卫生政策促使地方政府开展干预措施以预防疾病和减少住院治疗。