Suppr超能文献

衡量社区医疗服务提供者之间的横向整合:对姑息治疗网络内协作过程的考察。

Measuring horizontal integration among health care providers in the community: an examination of a collaborative process within a palliative care network.

作者信息

Bainbridge Daryl, Brazil Kevin, Krueger Paul, Ploeg Jenny, Taniguchi Alan, Darnay Julie

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University , Hamilton, Ontario , Canada .

出版信息

J Interprof Care. 2015 May;29(3):245-52. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2014.984019. Epub 2014 Nov 24.

Abstract

In many countries formal or informal palliative care networks (PCNs) have evolved to better integrate community-based services for individuals with a life-limiting illness. We conducted a cross-sectional survey using a customized tool to determine the perceptions of the processes of palliative care delivery reflective of horizontal integration from the perspective of nurses, physicians and allied health professionals working in a PCN, as well as to assess the utility of this tool. The process elements examined were part of a conceptual framework for evaluating integration of a system of care and centred on interprofessional collaboration. We used the Index of Interdisciplinary Collaboration (IIC) as a basis of measurement. The 86 respondents (85% response rate) placed high value on working collaboratively and most reported being part of an interprofessional team. The survey tool showed utility in identifying strengths and gaps in integration across the network and in detecting variability in some factors according to respondent agency affiliation and profession. Specifically, support for interprofessional communication and evaluative activities were viewed as insufficient. Impediments to these aspects of horizontal integration may be reflective of workload constraints, differences in agency operations or an absence of key structural features.

摘要

在许多国家,正式或非正式的姑息治疗网络(PCNs)已经发展起来,以便更好地整合针对患有危及生命疾病的个人的社区服务。我们使用定制工具进行了一项横断面调查,以确定从在姑息治疗网络中工作的护士、医生和专职医疗专业人员的角度来看,反映横向整合的姑息治疗提供过程的看法,并评估该工具的效用。所检查的过程要素是评估护理系统整合的概念框架的一部分,并且以跨专业合作为中心。我们使用跨学科合作指数(IIC)作为测量基础。86名受访者(回复率85%)高度重视协作工作,大多数人报告自己是跨专业团队的一员。该调查工具在识别整个网络整合中的优势和差距以及根据受访者的机构隶属关系和职业检测某些因素的变异性方面显示出效用。具体而言,对跨专业沟通和评估活动的支持被认为不足。这些横向整合方面的障碍可能反映了工作量限制、机构运作差异或关键结构特征的缺失。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验