• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
What is palliative care? Perceptions of healthcare professionals.什么是姑息治疗?医护人员的看法。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2019 Mar;33(1):77-84. doi: 10.1111/scs.12603. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
2
A painful experience of limited understanding: healthcare professionals' experiences with palliative care of people with severe dementia in Norwegian nursing homes.一种有限理解的痛苦体验:挪威疗养院中医疗保健专业人员对患有严重痴呆症的人的姑息治疗体验。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Feb 13;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0282-8.
3
Shared decision-making at the end of life: A focus group study exploring the perceptions and experiences of multi-disciplinary healthcare professionals working in the home setting.生命末期的共同决策:一项探索家庭环境中多学科医疗保健专业人员的看法和经验的焦点小组研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):123-132. doi: 10.1177/0269216317734434. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
4
Changes in professionals' beliefs following a palliative care implementation programme at a surgical department: a qualitative evaluation.外科病房姑息治疗实施计划后专业人员信念的变化:定性评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Dec 28;16(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0262-4.
5
Healthcare professionals' views of palliative care for American war veterans with non-malignant respiratory disease living in a rural area: a qualitative study.医疗保健专业人员对居住在农村地区的非恶性呼吸道疾病的美国退伍军人的姑息治疗观点:一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Feb 27;18(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0408-7.
6
"We never speak about death." Healthcare professionals' views on palliative care for inpatients in Tanzania: A qualitative study.我们从不谈论死亡。坦桑尼亚住院患者的姑息治疗:一项定性研究
Palliat Support Care. 2018 Oct;16(5):566-579. doi: 10.1017/S1478951517000748. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
7
Perceived barriers and facilitators in providing palliative care for people with severe dementia: the healthcare professionals' experiences.为重度痴呆患者提供姑息治疗时所感知到的障碍与促进因素:医疗专业人员的经验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 12;18(1):709. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3515-x.
8
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
9
Perceptions of health professionals on subcutaneous hydration in palliative care: A qualitative study.姑息治疗中卫生专业人员对皮下补液的看法:一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2016 Jun;30(6):549-57. doi: 10.1177/0269216315616763. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
10
Facilitators and barriers to the delivery of palliative care to children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions: a qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of healthcare professionals.为患有危及生命和有生命危险疾病的儿童提供姑息治疗的促进因素和障碍:对医疗保健专业人员的经历和看法的定性研究
Arch Dis Child. 2022 Jan;107(1):59-64. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-321808. Epub 2021 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Early Detection of Palliative Care Needs in Critically Ill Patients Using the NECPAL Tool.使用NECPAL工具对危重症患者姑息治疗需求的早期检测
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 4;14(17):6244. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176244.
2
Systematic referral to palliative care in patients attending dedicated emergency units from French comprehensive anticancer centres: the prospective multicentre randomised comparative clinical trial PALLU.法国综合抗癌中心专门急诊部门就诊患者的姑息治疗系统转诊:前瞻性多中心随机对照临床试验PALLU
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 24;15(8):e101299. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101299.
3
To treat or not to treat? Oncologists' perceptions and experiences regarding overtreatment in end stage cancer patients.治疗还是不治疗?肿瘤学家对晚期癌症患者过度治疗的看法与经历。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 10;12:1607479. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1607479. eCollection 2025.
4
Ethical reflection: The palliative care ethos and patients who refuse information.伦理反思:姑息治疗理念与拒绝信息的患者
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 Jul 3;19:26323524251355287. doi: 10.1177/26323524251355287. eCollection 2025.
5
'Early planning makes for a good death': residential aged care nurses' views on caring for those in the last months of life.“提前规划造就善终”:老年护理院护士对临终前几个月患者护理的看法
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):719. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03411-3.
6
Promoting interdisciplinarity and the timely integration of palliative care through the development and implementation of a blended learning elective for medical students.通过为医学生开发和实施混合式学习选修课,促进跨学科合作以及姑息治疗的及时整合。
GMS J Med Educ. 2025 Apr 15;42(2):Doc24. doi: 10.3205/zma001748. eCollection 2025.
7
Changes in end-of-life care models among Chinese older adults, 1998-2018: an age-period-cohort analysis.1998 - 2018年中国老年人临终关怀模式的变化:年龄-时期-队列分析
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06050-0.
8
Can we see the world the same? Interdisciplinarity in palliative care.我们看待世界的方式会相同吗?姑息治疗中的跨学科性。
Rev Cuid. 2022 Sep 1;13(1):e1. doi: 10.15649/cuidarte.2568. eCollection 2022 Jan-Apr.
9
Palliative care: a foreign language? Nurses' perspectives on palliative care in a French comprehensive cancer centre.姑息治疗:一门外语?法国一家综合性癌症中心护士对姑息治疗的看法。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Mar 13;24(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01678-6.
10
Artificially intelligent nursing homes: a scoping review of palliative care interventions.人工智能养老院:姑息治疗干预措施的范围综述
Front Digit Health. 2025 Feb 11;7:1484304. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1484304. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Serious Illness Conversations in ESRD.终末期肾病中的重病谈话
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 May 8;12(5):854-863. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05760516. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
2
Achieving Excellence in Palliative Care: Perspectives of Health Care Professionals.实现姑息治疗的卓越:医疗保健专业人员的观点。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Jan-Mar;3(1):66-72. doi: 10.4103/2347-5625.164999.
3
Health care professionals' attitudes regarding palliative care for patients with chronic heart failure: an interview study.医疗保健专业人员对慢性心力衰竭患者姑息治疗的态度:一项访谈研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Aug 15;15:76. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0149-9.
4
An exploratory study of interprofessional collaboration in end-of-life decision-making beyond palliative care settings.一项关于临终决策中跨专业协作的探索性研究,涉及姑息治疗环境之外的情况。
J Interprof Care. 2016 Nov;30(6):795-803. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1203765. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
5
Integrated palliative care in Europe: a qualitative systematic literature review of empirically-tested models in cancer and chronic disease.欧洲的综合姑息治疗:对癌症和慢性病中经过实证检验的模型的定性系统文献综述
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jul 8;15:56. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0130-7.
6
Conceptual foundations of a palliative approach: a knowledge synthesis.姑息治疗方法的概念基础:知识综合
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jan 15;15:5. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0076-9.
7
The Costs of Waiting: Implications of the Timing of Palliative Care Consultation among a Cohort of Decedents at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.等待的代价:综合癌症中心一批死者中姑息治疗咨询时机的影响
J Palliat Med. 2016 Jan;19(1):69-75. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0119. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
8
Development of the Serious Illness Care Program: a randomised controlled trial of a palliative care communication intervention.重症护理项目的发展:姑息治疗沟通干预的随机对照试验
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 6;5(10):e009032. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009032.
9
Measuring horizontal integration among health care providers in the community: an examination of a collaborative process within a palliative care network.衡量社区医疗服务提供者之间的横向整合:对姑息治疗网络内协作过程的考察。
J Interprof Care. 2015 May;29(3):245-52. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2014.984019. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
10
Staff nurses' perceptions regarding palliative care for hospitalized older adults.注册护士对住院老年人姑息治疗的看法。
Am J Nurs. 2014 Nov;114(11):26-34; quiz 35, 44. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000456424.02398.ef.

什么是姑息治疗?医护人员的看法。

What is palliative care? Perceptions of healthcare professionals.

作者信息

Wallerstedt Birgitta, Benzein Eva, Schildmeijer Kristina, Sandgren Anna

机构信息

Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Sweden.

Center for Collaborative Palliative Care, Linnaeus University, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Caring Sci. 2019 Mar;33(1):77-84. doi: 10.1111/scs.12603. Epub 2018 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1111/scs.12603
PMID:30101989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7432164/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite increased attention and knowledge in palliative care, there is still confusion concerning how to interpret the concept of palliative care and implement it in practice. This can result in difficulties for healthcare professionals in identifying patients whom would benefit from palliative care, which, in turn, could lead to a delay in meeting patients' needs.

AIM

To explore healthcare professionals' perceptions of palliative care.

METHOD

Data were collected through twelve interprofessional focus group interviews in community care and hospital wards in south Sweden (n = 74). All interviews were analysed with latent content analysis.

RESULTS

Three domains were revealed: first, a blurred conceptual understanding as participants described palliative care using synonyms, diagnoses, phases, natural care and holism; second, a challenge to communicate transitions concerned the importance of how and when the transition to palliative care was communicated and documented; finally, a need for interprofessional collaboration was described as well as the consequences for severely ill persons, relatives and healthcare professionals when it was not established.

CONCLUSION

The perceptions about how to interpret palliative care differed as well as when palliative care should be offered and decided, which might have practical consequences. How long a person has left to live is of great significance for decision-making, caregiving and preparation in palliative care. The challenge is to use interprofessional communication to promote understanding and collaborate across varied care levels. Integrating palliative care across diverse care levels could be one way to reduce the ambiguity of palliative care.

摘要

背景

尽管对姑息治疗的关注度和了解有所增加,但在如何解释姑息治疗的概念以及在实践中实施该概念方面仍存在困惑。这可能导致医疗保健专业人员难以识别能从姑息治疗中受益的患者,进而可能导致满足患者需求的延迟。

目的

探讨医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗的看法。

方法

通过在瑞典南部社区护理和医院病房进行的12次跨专业焦点小组访谈收集数据(n = 74)。所有访谈均采用潜在内容分析法进行分析。

结果

揭示了三个领域:第一,概念理解模糊,因为参与者使用同义词、诊断、阶段、自然护理和整体论来描述姑息治疗;第二,沟通转变面临挑战,涉及到如何以及何时传达和记录向姑息治疗的转变的重要性;最后,描述了对跨专业协作的需求以及未建立协作时对重症患者、亲属和医疗保健专业人员的影响。

结论

对于如何解释姑息治疗以及何时提供和决定姑息治疗的看法存在差异,这可能会产生实际后果。一个人还能活多久对于姑息治疗中的决策、护理和准备具有重要意义。挑战在于利用跨专业沟通来促进理解并在不同护理层面进行协作。在不同护理层面整合姑息治疗可能是减少姑息治疗模糊性的一种方法。